Re: [PATCH] mm: use only pidfd for process_madvise syscall

[Andrew Morton]

On Mon, 18 May 2020 14:13:50 -0700 Minchan Kim <minchan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Andrew, I sent this patch without folding into previous syscall introducing
> patches because it could be arguable. If you want to fold it into each
> patchset(i.e., introdcuing process_madvise syscall and introducing
> compat_syscall), let me know it. I will send partial diff to each
> patchset.

It doesn't seem necessary - I believe we'll get a clean result if I
squish all of these:

mm-support-vector-address-ranges-for-process_madvise-fix.patch
mm-support-vector-address-ranges-for-process_madvise-fix-fix.patch
mm-support-vector-address-ranges-for-process_madvise-fix-fix-fix.patch
mm-support-vector-address-ranges-for-process_madvise-fix-fix-fix-fix.patch
mm-support-vector-address-ranges-for-process_madvise-fix-fix-fix-fix-fix.patch
mm-use-only-pidfd-for-process_madvise-syscall.patch

into mm-support-vector-address-ranges-for-process_madvise.patch and
make the appropriate changelog adjustments?