On Tue, 2020-05-26 at 16:54 -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
On 5/26/20 4:27 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
On Tue, 2020-05-26 at 11:04 -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:Sounds good.
On 5/22/20 8:26 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
On Fri, 2020-05-22 at 20:19 -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
get_maintainer.pl picks only the first email address found in the file.
Reorder my email addresses so it finds my linuxfoundation.org email.
Sadly, people that don't run get_maintainer.pl, leave alone running it
with --noremove-duplicates option. So your suggestion doesn't really
My preference is to get patches to both Inboxes if possible which isn't
possible unless -noremove-duplicate is default. Having this option as
default probably will annoy lot of people . So I am not asking for
That being said, I don't understand your comment. Are you recommending
using just one email in these entries?
Yes. And maybe set an autoforward rule in that email to
forward the received email to your other address.
Another option would be to write your name
slightly differently in the 2 entries.
For instance, add "(LF)" to the linuxfoundation.org entry like:
CPU POWER MONITORING SUBSYSTEM
M: Thomas Renninger <trenn@xxxxxxxx>
M: Shuah Khan <shuah@xxxxxxxxxx>
M: Shuah Khan (LF) <skhan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
and then the get_maintainer.pl script won't
collapse the equally named but with different
email addresses into a single entry:
$ ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f tools/power/cpupower/
Thomas Renninger <trenn@xxxxxxxx> (maintainer:CPU POWER MONITORING SUBSYSTEM)
Shuah Khan <shuah@xxxxxxxxxx> (maintainer:CPU POWER MONITORING SUBSYSTEM)
"Shuah Khan (LF)" <skhan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (maintainer:CPU POWER MONITORING SUBSYSTEM)
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (open list:CPU POWER MONITORING SUBSYSTEM)
linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (open list)