Re: [PATCH 01/10] clk: qcom: clk-alpha-pll: remove unused/incorrect PLL_CAL_VAL
From: Stephen Boyd
Date: Tue May 26 2020 - 22:42:15 EST
Quoting Jonathan Marek (2020-05-26 16:30:38)
> On 5/26/20 7:21 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Jonathan Marek (2020-05-24 14:06:02)
> >> 0x44 isn't a register offset, it is the value that goes into CAL_L_VAL.
> >> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Marek <jonathan@xxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> > Any fixes tag?
> This doesn't fix anything (its unused as the commit message says), does
> that still qualify for a fixes tag?
Sure. Even if it's unused it could be used by someone who backported the