Re: [RFC PATCH -next] MAINTAINERS: Update F: and X: entry ordering (was Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] MAINTAINERS: Add maintainers for MIPS core drivers)

From: Serge Semin
Date: Tue Jun 02 2020 - 05:52:02 EST


Hello Joe

On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 11:22:58AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-06-01 at 19:04 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 6:52 PM Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 06:30:22PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 6:19 PM Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 04:56:21PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > > > On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 3:26 PM Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > > > Add myself as a maintainer of MIPS CPU and GIC IRQchip, MIPS GIC timer
> > > > > > > and MIPS CPS CPUidle drivers.
> > > > > > ...
> > > > > > > +MIPS CORE DRIVERS
> > > > > > > +M: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > > > +L: linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > > > +S: Supported
> > > > > > > +F: drivers/bus/mips_cdmm.c
> > > > > > > +F: drivers/irqchip/irq-mips-cpu.c
> > > > > > > +F: drivers/irqchip/irq-mips-gic.c
> > > > > > > +F: drivers/clocksource/mips-gic-timer.c
> > > > > > > +F: drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-cps.c
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I think nowadays checkpatch.pl warns on wrong ordering in this data base.
> []
> > > Next time I won't forget that then. BTW the notes at the top of the MAINTAINERS
> > > file don't explicitly say about the files-list order. Only about the
> > > whole maintainers list entries order. Seeing the rest of the sub-entries like
> > > L:, M:, etc. aren't ordered then it's probably better to have an explicit
> > > statement, that files should be alphabetically listed, especially when
> > > checkpatch.pl starts warning about that.
> >
> > Joe, what do you think?
>
> Fine by me. Maybe something like the below.
>
> Another thing might be to intermix the F and X entries so that
> exclusions are more obviously against the F: entries.
>
> There aren't many MAINTAINERS lines changed when the modified
> parse-maintainers is run, but I think it reads better.
>
> It doesn't seem the last major reordering with parse-maintainers
> caused any significant issue for anyone.

I was also thinking about a text explaining the F: section order requirement.
Like this:

diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 865aeafee3b2..253f8f97891f 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -111,7 +111,8 @@ Descriptions of section entries and preferred order
F: drivers/net/ all files in and below drivers/net
F: drivers/net/* all files in drivers/net, but not below
F: */net/* all files in "any top level directory"/net
- One pattern per line. Multiple F: lines acceptable.
+ One pattern per line. Multiple F: lines acceptable, but are
+ supposed to be listed in alphabetical order.
X: *Excluded* files and directories that are NOT maintained, same
rules as F:. Files exclusions are tested before file matches.
Can be useful for excluding a specific subdirectory, for instance:

The rest suggested by you is fine with me. Intermixing F and X seems reasonable
so the maintainers could group inclusion and exclusion sections together
with respect to the files/directories they refer to.

-Sergey

>
> I think having Linus run scripts/parse-maintainers.pl just before
> every release or every few releases would make this issue go away.
> ---
> MAINTAINERS | 1 +
> scripts/checkpatch.pl | 17 +++++++----------
> scripts/parse-maintainers.pl | 5 ++---
> 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index b045b70e54df..4b53119504ff 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -118,6 +118,7 @@ Descriptions of section entries and preferred order
> F: net/
> X: net/ipv6/
> matches all files in and below net excluding net/ipv6/
> + F: and X: entries are intermixed in case sensitive alphabetic order
> N: Files and directories *Regex* patterns.
> N: [^a-z]tegra all files whose path contains tegra
> (not including files like integrator)
> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> index dd750241958b..499c85be0b2f 100755
> --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> @@ -3099,16 +3099,13 @@ sub process {
> if ($curindex < 0) {
> WARN("MAINTAINERS_STYLE",
> "Unknown MAINTAINERS entry type: '$cur'\n" . $herecurr);
> - } else {
> - if ($previndex >= 0 && $curindex < $previndex) {
> - WARN("MAINTAINERS_STYLE",
> - "Misordered MAINTAINERS entry - list '$cur:' before '$prev:'\n" . $hereprev);
> - } elsif ((($prev eq 'F' && $cur eq 'F') ||
> - ($prev eq 'X' && $cur eq 'X')) &&
> - ($prevval cmp $curval) > 0) {
> - WARN("MAINTAINERS_STYLE",
> - "Misordered MAINTAINERS entry - list file patterns in alphabetic order\n" . $hereprev);
> - }
> + } elsif ($previndex >= 0 && $curindex < $previndex && !($prev =~ /[FX]/ && $cur =~ /[FX]/)) {
> + WARN("MAINTAINERS_STYLE",
> + "Misordered MAINTAINERS entry - list '$cur:' before '$prev:'\n" . $hereprev);
> + } elsif ((($prev =~ /[FX]/ && $cur =~ /[FX]/) &&
> + ($prevval cmp $curval) > 0)) {
> + WARN("MAINTAINERS_STYLE",
> + "Misordered MAINTAINERS entry - list F and X file patterns in alphabetic order\n" . $hereprev);
> }
> }
> }
> diff --git a/scripts/parse-maintainers.pl b/scripts/parse-maintainers.pl
> index 2ca4eb3f190d..8d2247a596f0 100755
> --- a/scripts/parse-maintainers.pl
> +++ b/scripts/parse-maintainers.pl
> @@ -84,9 +84,8 @@ sub by_pattern($$) {
> $a_index = 1000 if ($a_index == -1);
> $b_index = 1000 if ($b_index == -1);
>
> - if (($a1 =~ /^F$/ && $b1 =~ /^F$/) ||
> - ($a1 =~ /^X$/ && $b1 =~ /^X$/)) {
> - return $a cmp $b;
> + if (($a1 =~ /^[FX]$/ && $b1 =~ /^[FX]$/)) {
> + return substr($a, 1) cmp substr($b, 1);
> }
>
> if ($a_index < $b_index) {
>
>