Re: [PATCH v4 06/11] gpio: add support for the sl28cpld GPIO controller

From: Andy Shevchenko
Date: Fri Jun 05 2020 - 08:01:04 EST


On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 12:14 AM Michael Walle <michael@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Add support for the GPIO controller of the sl28 board management
> controller. This driver is part of a multi-function device.
>
> A controller has 8 lines. There are three different flavors:
> full-featured GPIO with interrupt support, input-only and output-only.

...

> +#include <linux/of_device.h>

I think also not needed.
But wait...

> + return devm_regmap_add_irq_chip_np(dev, dev_of_node(dev), regmap,

It seems regmap needs to be converted to use fwnode.

> + irq, IRQF_SHARED | IRQF_ONESHOT, 0,
> + irq_chip, &gpio->irq_data);

...

> + if (!pdev->dev.parent)
> + return -ENODEV;

Are we expecting to get shot into foot? I mean why we need this check?

> + dev_id = platform_get_device_id(pdev);
> + if (dev_id)
> + type = dev_id->driver_data;

Oh, no. In new code we don't need this. We have facilities to provide
platform data in a form of fwnode.

> + else
> + type = (uintptr_t)of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);

So does this. device_get_match_data().

> + if (!type)
> + return -ENODEV;

...

> + if (irq_support &&

Why do you need this flag? Can't simple IRQ number be sufficient?

> + device_property_read_bool(&pdev->dev, "interrupt-controller")) {
> + irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> + if (irq < 0)
> + return irq;
> +
> + ret = sl28cpld_gpio_irq_init(&pdev->dev, gpio, regmap,
> + base, irq);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + config.irq_domain = regmap_irq_get_domain(gpio->irq_data);
> + }

...

> +static const struct of_device_id sl28cpld_gpio_of_match[] = {

> + { .compatible = "kontron,sl28cpld-gpio",
> + .data = (void *)SL28CPLD_GPIO },
> + { .compatible = "kontron,sl28cpld-gpi",
> + .data = (void *)SL28CPLD_GPI },
> + { .compatible = "kontron,sl28cpld-gpo",
> + .data = (void *)SL28CPLD_GPO },

All above can be twice less LOCs.

> + {},

No comma.

> +};


...

> + .name = KBUILD_MODNAME,

This actually not good idea in long term. File name can change and break an ABI.

--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko