Re: [PATCH v3 03/15] PCI: Use PCI_IRQ_MSI_TYPES where appropriate

[Logan Gunthorpe]

On 2020-06-09 9:51 a.m., Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 11:16:46AM +0200, Piotr Stankiewicz wrote:
>> Seeing as there is shorthand available to use when asking for any type
>> of interrupt, or any type of message signalled interrupt, leverage it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Piotr Stankiewicz <piotr.stankiewicz@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> The patch actually adding PCI_IRQ_MSI_TYPES still didn't show up on
> linux-pci.
> 
> But from the person who added PCI_IRQ_*:
> 
> NAK to the whole concept of PCI_IRQ_MSI_TYPES, I think this just makes
> the code a lot more confusing.  Especially with the new IMS interrupt
> type, which really is a MSI-like interrupt but certainly shouldn't be
> added to this mask.

Yes, after cleaning up the first patch to not require the long messy
conditional, this change doesn't seems like a win. I agree we should
drop these patches.

Logan