Re: [PATCH 1/2] xhci: Suspend ports to U3 directly from U1 or U2

From: Kai-Heng Feng
Date: Thu Jun 11 2020 - 03:41:47 EST




> On Jun 10, 2020, at 23:58, Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 10.6.2020 18.43, Kai-Heng Feng wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Jun 10, 2020, at 22:32, Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 02:42:30PM +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote:
>>>> xHCI spec "4.15.1 Port Suspend" states that port can be put to U3 as long
>>>> as Enabled bit is set and from U0, U1 or U2 state.
>>>>
>>>> Currently only USB_PORT_FEAT_LINK_STATE puts port to U3 directly, let's
>>>> do the same for USB_PORT_FEAT_SUSPEND and bus suspend case.
>>>>
>>>> This is particularly useful for USB2 devices, which may take a very long
>>>> time to switch USB2 LPM on and off.
>>>
>>> Have these two patches been tested with a variety of USB-2.0 and USB-2.1
>>> devices?
>>
>> I tested some laptops around and they work fine.
>> Only internally connected USB devices like USB Bluetooth and USB Camera have USB2 LPM enabled, so this patch won't affect external connected devices.
>>
>
> Took a fresh look at the USB2 side and it's not as clear as the USB3 case, where
> we know the hub must support transition to U3 from any other state. [1]
>
> Supporting link state transition to U3 (USB2 L2) from any other U state for USB2 seems
> to be xHCI specific feature. xHC hardware will make sure it goes via the U0 state.
>
> I have no clue about other hosts (or hubs), USB2 LPM ECN just shows that link
> state transitions to L1 or L2 should always goes via L0.
> It's possible this has to be done in software by disabling USB2 LPM before suspending the device.

Is there any host or hub other than xHCI support USB2 LPM? Seem like only xHCI implements it.

>
> So I guess the original suggestion to wait for link state to reach U0 before
> is a better solution. Sorry about my hasty suggestion.
>
> Kai-Heng, does it help if you fist manually set the link to U0 before disabling
> USB2 LPM (set PLS to 0 before clearing the HLE bit). Does it transition to U0
> any faster, or get rid of the extra port event with PLC:U0?

diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
index 03b64b73eb99..0b8db13e79e4 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
@@ -4385,7 +4385,7 @@ static int xhci_set_usb2_hardware_lpm(struct usb_hcd *hcd,
struct xhci_hcd *xhci = hcd_to_xhci(hcd);
struct xhci_port **ports;
__le32 __iomem *pm_addr, *hlpm_addr;
- u32 pm_val, hlpm_val, field;
+ u32 portsc, pm_val, hlpm_val, field;
unsigned int port_num;
unsigned long flags;
int hird, exit_latency;
@@ -4463,6 +4463,15 @@ static int xhci_set_usb2_hardware_lpm(struct usb_hcd *hcd,
/* flush write */
readl(pm_addr);
} else {
+ portsc = readl(ports[port_num]->addr);
+ if ((portsc & PORT_PE) && ((portsc & PORT_PLS_MASK) == XDEV_U1 ||
+ (portsc & PORT_PLS_MASK) == XDEV_U2)) {
+ xhci_set_link_state(xhci, ports[port_num], XDEV_U0);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&xhci->lock, flags);
+ dev_info(&udev->dev, "DEBUG: SLEEP\n");
+ msleep(100);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&xhci->lock, flags);
+ }
pm_val &= ~(PORT_HLE | PORT_RWE | PORT_HIRD_MASK | PORT_L1DS_MASK);
writel(pm_val, pm_addr);
/* flush write */

If there's a long enough delay for U0 before clearing HLE, then the PLC can be avoided.
It's not any faster though.

Kai-Heng

>
> -Mathias
>
>
> [1]
> USB3.1 spec (10.16.2.10) Set Port feature:
> "If the value is 3, then host software wants to selectively suspend the
> device connected to this port. The hub shall transition the link to U3
> from any of the other U states using allowed link state transitions.
> If the port is not already in the U0 state, then it shall transition the
> port to the U0 state and then initiate the transition to U3.