Re: [PATCH] mfd: sprd: get subdevices from DT instead for SC27XX SPI

From: Lee Jones
Date: Tue Jun 16 2020 - 03:12:23 EST


On Mon, 15 Jun 2020, Baolin Wang wrote:

> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 11:47 AM Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > From: Chunyan Zhang <chunyan.zhang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > SC27XX-SPI added subdevices according to a pre-defined mfd_cell array,
> > no matter these devices were really included on board. So with this
> > patch we switch to a new way of detecting subdevices which are
> > defined in the devicetree.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chunyan Zhang <chunyan.zhang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/mfd/sprd-sc27xx-spi.c | 102 +++++++++++-----------------------
> > 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 71 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/sprd-sc27xx-spi.c b/drivers/mfd/sprd-sc27xx-spi.c
> > index 33336cde4724..aa3daa0cfcf5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mfd/sprd-sc27xx-spi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mfd/sprd-sc27xx-spi.c
> > @@ -93,73 +93,6 @@ enum usb_charger_type sprd_pmic_detect_charger_type(struct device *dev)
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sprd_pmic_detect_charger_type);
> >
> > -static const struct mfd_cell sprd_pmic_devs[] = {
> > - {
> > - .name = "sc27xx-wdt",
> > - .of_compatible = "sprd,sc2731-wdt",
> > - }, {
> > - .name = "sc27xx-rtc",
> > - .of_compatible = "sprd,sc2731-rtc",
> > - }, {
> > - .name = "sc27xx-charger",
> > - .of_compatible = "sprd,sc2731-charger",
> > - }, {
> > - .name = "sc27xx-chg-timer",
> > - .of_compatible = "sprd,sc2731-chg-timer",
> > - }, {
> > - .name = "sc27xx-fast-chg",
> > - .of_compatible = "sprd,sc2731-fast-chg",
> > - }, {
> > - .name = "sc27xx-chg-wdt",
> > - .of_compatible = "sprd,sc2731-chg-wdt",
> > - }, {
> > - .name = "sc27xx-typec",
> > - .of_compatible = "sprd,sc2731-typec",
> > - }, {
> > - .name = "sc27xx-flash",
> > - .of_compatible = "sprd,sc2731-flash",
> > - }, {
> > - .name = "sc27xx-eic",
> > - .of_compatible = "sprd,sc2731-eic",
> > - }, {
> > - .name = "sc27xx-efuse",
> > - .of_compatible = "sprd,sc2731-efuse",
> > - }, {
> > - .name = "sc27xx-thermal",
> > - .of_compatible = "sprd,sc2731-thermal",
> > - }, {
> > - .name = "sc27xx-adc",
> > - .of_compatible = "sprd,sc2731-adc",
> > - }, {
> > - .name = "sc27xx-audio-codec",
> > - .of_compatible = "sprd,sc2731-audio-codec",
> > - }, {
> > - .name = "sc27xx-regulator",
> > - .of_compatible = "sprd,sc2731-regulator",
> > - }, {
> > - .name = "sc27xx-vibrator",
> > - .of_compatible = "sprd,sc2731-vibrator",
> > - }, {
> > - .name = "sc27xx-keypad-led",
> > - .of_compatible = "sprd,sc2731-keypad-led",
> > - }, {
> > - .name = "sc27xx-bltc",
> > - .of_compatible = "sprd,sc2731-bltc",
> > - }, {
> > - .name = "sc27xx-fgu",
> > - .of_compatible = "sprd,sc2731-fgu",
> > - }, {
> > - .name = "sc27xx-7sreset",
> > - .of_compatible = "sprd,sc2731-7sreset",
> > - }, {
> > - .name = "sc27xx-poweroff",
> > - .of_compatible = "sprd,sc2731-poweroff",
> > - }, {
> > - .name = "sc27xx-syscon",
> > - .of_compatible = "sprd,sc2731-syscon",
> > - },
> > -};
> > -
> > static int sprd_pmic_spi_write(void *context, const void *data, size_t count)
> > {
> > struct device *dev = context;
> > @@ -205,6 +138,35 @@ static const struct regmap_config sprd_pmic_config = {
> > .max_register = 0xffff,
> > };
> >
> > +static int sprd_pmic_add_subdevices(struct device *dev, int id,
> > + struct irq_domain *domain)
> > +{
> > + int ret = 0;
> > + struct device_node *child, *parent = dev->of_node;
> > + struct mfd_cell cell = {0};
> > + const char *comp;
> > + unsigned int prefix_len = strlen("sprd,");
> > + char buf[30];
> > +
> > + for_each_child_of_node(parent, child) {
> > + comp = of_get_property(child, "compatible", NULL);
> > + if (!comp || strncmp("sprd,", comp, prefix_len))
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + memcpy(buf, comp, strlen(comp) + 1);
> > + cell.of_compatible = buf;
> > + cell.name = buf + prefix_len;
>
> I feel it is a little hackish, you can create any device nodes from DT
> even the PMIC does not support.
>
> I am not sure the problem caused by the original method, you can use
> the compatible string to be compatible with different PMICs, such as
> SC2730 ADC:
> compatible = "sprd,sc2731-adc", "sprd,sc2730-adc";
>
> Moreover I think you can add the "sprd,sc2730-xxx" compatible string
> for the mfd_cell in this driver if you are sure we want to support
> SC2730 PMIC.

Why not just use of_platform_populate()?

> > +
> > + ret = devm_mfd_add_devices(dev, id, &cell, 1, NULL, 0, domain);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + pr_err("devm_mfd_add_devices return fail ret=%d\n", ret);
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > static int sprd_pmic_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> > {
> > struct sprd_pmic *ddata;
> > @@ -263,10 +225,8 @@ static int sprd_pmic_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > - ret = devm_mfd_add_devices(&spi->dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO,
> > - sprd_pmic_devs, ARRAY_SIZE(sprd_pmic_devs),
> > - NULL, 0,
> > - regmap_irq_get_domain(ddata->irq_data));
> > + ret = sprd_pmic_add_subdevices(&spi->dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO,
> > + regmap_irq_get_domain(ddata->irq_data));
> > if (ret) {
> > dev_err(&spi->dev, "Failed to register device %d\n", ret);
> > return ret;
> >
>
>

--
Lee Jones [æçæ]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org â Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog