Re: [v2] Documentation: Coccinelle: fix typos and command example

From: Randy Dunlap
Date: Wed Jul 01 2020 - 11:07:20 EST


On 7/1/20 8:02 AM, Markus Elfring wrote:
>>>>> How do you think about to use the following command variant
>>>>> for the adjustment of the software documentation?
>>>>>
>>>>> + make C=1 CHECK='scripts/coccicheck' 'path/to/file.o'
>>>>
>>>> I don't understand the reason for that change...
>>
>> IOW, your "patch" needs justification and/or explanation. It was missing that info.
>
> I hope that the clarification of the presented questions can result into
> relevant information.
>
>
>>> Is our understanding still incomplete for the support of source code checking parameters
>>> by the make script?
>>>
>>> * Will software analysis be performed in addition to the desired compilation
>>> of a source file (according to the selected object file)?
>>>
>>> * How do you think about to trigger only the generation of analysis results
>>> for a single file?
>>
>> Do I need to remove that line from the patch?
>
> I propose to adjust it another bit.
> The desired change agreement might need further communication efforts.
>
>
>> Feel free to submit patches, not just comments.
>
> Would you like to integrate any more details from the running patch review?

I am satisfied with the current patch.

No doubt that any documentation can be improved, almost ad infinitum,
but I'm not trying to do that. I'm trying not to do that.


--
~Randy