Re: [PATCH v9 09/15] perf stat: factor out event handling loop into dispatch_events()

[Jiri Olsa]

On Fri, Jul 03, 2020 at 10:46:15AM +0300, Alexey Budankov wrote:
> 
> Consolidate event dispatching loops for fork, attach and system
> wide monitoring use cases into common dispatch_events() function.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  tools/perf/builtin-stat.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
> index 3e11f854ffc8..723f1fe27d63 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
> @@ -550,6 +550,30 @@ static bool is_target_alive(struct target *_target,
>  	return false;
>  }
>  
> +static int dispatch_events(bool forks, int timeout, int interval, int *times, struct timespec *ts)
> +{
> +	bool stop = false;
> +	int child_exited = 0, status = 0;
> +
> +	while (1) {
> +		if (forks)
> +			child_exited = waitpid(child_pid, &status, WNOHANG);
> +		else
> +			child_exited = !is_target_alive(&target, evsel_list->core.threads) ? 1 : 0;
> +
> +		if (done || stop || child_exited)
> +			break;

can (done || stop) be in the while condition and
we'd check just child_exited in here?

> +
> +		nanosleep(ts, NULL);
> +		if (timeout)
> +			stop = true;

can we just break out in here? like the original code?
I don't think we need the extra iteration

> +		else
> +			stop = handle_interval(interval, times);

same here..?


thanks,
jirka


> +	}
> +
> +	return status;
> +}
> +

SNIP