Re: [PATCH] kvm: x86: rewrite kvm_spec_ctrl_valid_bits

From: Paolo Bonzini
Date: Tue Jul 07 2020 - 13:26:11 EST


On 07/07/20 13:35, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> After thinking about this, I am thinking that we should apply similiar logic
> as done with the 'cpu-pm' related features.
> This way the user can choose between passing through the IA32_SPEC_CTRL,
> (and in this case, we can since the user choose it, pass it right away, and thus
> avoid using kvm_spec_ctrl_valid_bits completely), and between correctness,
> in which case we can always emulate this msr, and therefore check all the bits,
> both regard to guest and host supported values.

Unfortunately, passing it through is just too slow. So I think it's
overkill. There's two ways to deal with badly-behaved guests blocking
migration: 1) hide SPEC_CTRL altogether 2) kill them when migration
fails; both are acceptable depending on the situation.

Paolo

> Does this makes sense, or do you think that this is overkill?