Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't force IOSF_MBI

From: Chris Wilson
Date: Fri Jul 17 2020 - 15:33:12 EST

Next message: Guenter Roeck: "Re: [PATCH][next] watchdog: scx200_wdt: Use fallthrough pseudo-keyword"
Previous message: Thomas Gleixner: "Re: [patch V3 01/13] entry: Provide generic syscall entry functionality"
In reply to: Jisheng Zhang: "[PATCH] drm/i915: Don't force IOSF_MBI"
Next in thread: Jisheng Zhang: "Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't force IOSF_MBI"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Quoting Jisheng Zhang (2020-07-17 07:11:38)
> The i915 doesn't depend on IOSF_MBI, asm/iosf_mbi.h already defines
> isof_mbi_* APIs when ISOF_MBI is disabled.
>
> Don't force IOSF_MBI to allow disabling IOSF_MBI for non SoC platforms.

But it is required for Valleyview/Cherryview and we want to support
those by default. Tricky.
-Chris

Next message: Guenter Roeck: "Re: [PATCH][next] watchdog: scx200_wdt: Use fallthrough pseudo-keyword"
Previous message: Thomas Gleixner: "Re: [patch V3 01/13] entry: Provide generic syscall entry functionality"
In reply to: Jisheng Zhang: "[PATCH] drm/i915: Don't force IOSF_MBI"
Next in thread: Jisheng Zhang: "Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Don't force IOSF_MBI"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]