RE: [PATCH 3/6] ASoC: amd: SND_SOC_RT5682_I2C does not build rt5682
From: RAVULAPATI, VISHNU VARDHAN RAO
Date: Tue Jul 28 2020 - 02:59:55 EST
[AMD Official Use Only - Internal Distribution Only]
So Actually for rt5682 codec Now in 5.8 there are three flags :
But till 5.7.8 we have
So in our design we were using SND_SOC_RT5682 which build snd_soc_rt5682.ko
Creates the respective codec_dais as defined in that .ko
If we use SND_SOC_RT5682_I2C we get snd_soc_rt5682_I2c.ko , it is not creating the expected codec_dai links.
As there are three flags defined in codecs, I expect that previous one which we were using(SND_SOC_RT5682) is not a wrong flag and I expect to use
SND_SOC_RT5682 as it is still available.
From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, July 27, 2020 9:40 PM
To: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: RAVULAPATI, VISHNU VARDHAN RAO <Vishnuvardhanrao.Ravulapati@xxxxxxx>; moderated list:SOUND - SOC LAYER / DYNAMIC AUDIO POWER MANAGEM... <alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>; open list <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; YueHaibing <yuehaibing@xxxxxxxxxx>; Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxxx>; Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@xxxxxxxxx>; Mukunda, Vijendar <Vijendar.Mukunda@xxxxxxx>; Deucher, Alexander <Alexander.Deucher@xxxxxxx>; Agrawal, Akshu <Akshu.Agrawal@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] ASoC: amd: SND_SOC_RT5682_I2C does not build rt5682
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 10:31:24AM -0500, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> On 7/27/20 9:58 AM, Ravulapati Vishnu vardhan rao wrote:
> > changing SND_SOC_RT5682_I2C to SND_SOC_RT5682 because, This flag
> > which was previously set as SND_SOC_RT5682 used to build rt5682
> > codec driver but by changing into SND_SOC_RT5682_I2C is preventing
> > to build rt5682 codec driver and machine driver fails to probe.So
> > Reverting the changes.
> The split between I2C and SoundWire means you have to choose the I2C
> or SDW mode. Selecting the common part looks very strange.
Right, and I can't understand the commit message at all. What's the actual issue here and how could this fix it - in what situation wouldn't you need one of the bus modules?