Re: [PATCH RFC v6 1/6] dt-bindings: display: add Unisoc's drm master bindings

[Sam Ravnborg]

Hi Kevin

On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 06:07:54PM +0800, Kevin Tang wrote:
> From: Kevin Tang <kevin.tang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> The Unisoc DRM master device is a virtual device needed to list all
> DPU devices or other display interface nodes that comprise the
> graphics subsystem
> 
> Cc: Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Tang <kevin.tang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/display/sprd/drm.yaml      | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 36 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/sprd/drm.yaml
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/sprd/drm.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/sprd/drm.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..b5792c0
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/sprd/drm.yaml
drm seems like a sub-optimal name.
How about usign the compatible name "display-subsystem" as it is a bit
more specific (but not good).

> @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0

Any chance this can be (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause).
I noticed that for example clock/sprd,sc9863a-clk.yaml uses this license
so I hope this is OK.

> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/display/sprd/drm.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Unisoc DRM master device
> +
> +maintainers:
> +  - Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
> +
> +description: |
> +  The Unisoc DRM master device is a virtual device needed to list all
> +  DPU devices or other display interface nodes that comprise the
> +  graphics subsystem.
> +
> +properties:
> +  compatible:
> +    const: sprd,display-subsystem
> +
> +  ports:
> +    description:
> +      Should contain a list of phandles pointing to display interface port
> +      of DPU devices.
Add type - like this:
$ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle-array

See for example display/rockchip/rockchip-drm.yaml

Any specific reason why this is not a ports node like used by many other
display bindings?
In other words - I think this is too simple.

> +
> +required:
> +  - compatible
> +  - ports
> +

Add:
additionalProperties: false

so we catch if other properties sneak in.

> +examples:
> +  - |
> +    display-subsystem {
> +        compatible = "sprd,display-subsystem";
> +        ports = <&dpu_out>;
> +    };
> +
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel