Re: [v2,2/3] dt-bindings: watchdog: add a new head file for toprgu reset-controllers

[Crystal Guo]

On Wed, 2020-07-29 at 16:15 +0800, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> 
> On 29/07/2020 10:11, Crystal Guo wrote:
> > On Wed, 2020-07-29 at 15:42 +0800, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> >> Hi Crystal,
> >>
> >> On 29/07/2020 08:30, Crystal Guo wrote:
> >>> merge all the reset numbers in one head file.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Crystal Guo <crystal.guo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> ---
> >>>    include/dt-bindings/reset-controller/mtk-resets.h | 13 +++++++++++++
> >>>    1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
> >>>    create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/reset-controller/mtk-resets.h
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/reset-controller/mtk-resets.h b/include/dt-bindings/reset-controller/mtk-resets.h
> >>> new file mode 100644
> >>> index 0000000..d73a4ba
> >>> --- /dev/null
> >>> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/reset-controller/mtk-resets.h
> >>> @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
> >>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> >>> +/*
> >>> + * Copyright (C) 2020 Mediatek Inc.
> >>> + *
> >>> + */
> >>> +
> >>> +#ifndef _DT_BINDINGS_RESET_CONTROLLER_MTK
> >>> +#define _DT_BINDINGS_RESET_CONTROLLER_MTK
> >>> +
> >>> +#define MT2712_TOPRGU_SW_RST_NUM	11
> >>> +#define MT8183_TOPRGU_SW_RST_NUM        19
> >>
> >> Maybe I didn't explain myself properly. We want to have all resets in one file
> >> and do not want to have the resets for the watchdog in a different file. That
> >> means I don't thin your patch is correct and the effort should be abandoned.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Matthias
> > 
> > Do you mean to keep the current way unchanged? For example, with a new
> > SOC 8192, should add a new head file mt8192_resets.h for the resets
> > numbers.
> > 
> 
> Exactly.
> 
> Regards,
> Matthias

OK, but the dt-binding mtk-wdt.txt still need to update, please help me
to review, many thanks~