Re: [PATCH v2] sched: Provide USF for the portable equipment.

[Greg KH]

On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 08:46:30PM +0800, Dongdong Yang wrote:
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/staging/fbsched/usf.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,346 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2020 XiaoMi Inc.
> + * Author: Yang Dongdong <yangdongdong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + *
> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
> + * See http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.html for more details.

Please remove the license "boilerplate" text as you have the SPDX line
on top.

> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/init.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/kthread.h>
> +#include <linux/cpu.h>
> +#include <linux/sysfs.h>
> +#include <linux/kthread.h>
> +#include <linux/kobject.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/init.h>
> +#include <linux/kallsyms.h>
> +#include <linux/debugfs.h>
> +#include <linux/fb.h>
> +#include <linux/notifier.h>
> +
> +#define BOOST_MIN_V -100
> +#define BOOST_MAX_V 100
> +#define LEVEL_TOP 3
> +
> +#define USF_TAG	"[usf_sched]"
> +
> +DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long[PID_MAX_LIMIT], task_hist_nivcsw);
> +
> +static struct {
> +	bool is_sched_usf_enabled;
> +	int enable_debug;
> +	int is_screen_on;
> +	struct kobject *kobj;

A raw kobject?  For a driver?  are you _SURE_???

> +	struct dentry *debugfs_entry;

Why do you need this?

> +	usf_vdev.enable_debug = 0;
> +	usf_vdev.debugfs_entry = debugfs_create_file("usf_dbg",
> +						     0660, NULL, NULL,
> +						     &usf_dbg_fops);
> +	if (!usf_vdev.debugfs_entry)
> +		pr_err("Failed to create usf_dbg!\n");

How can that value be NULL?

There is no need to check debugfs functions for error values.

But in this case, why are you writing a single file to the root of
debugfs?  Why not put it in a directory instead?  That would be much
nicer, don't you think?

thanks,

greg k-h