Re: [PATCH] ASoC: fsl_sai: Clean code for synchronize mode

From: Nicolin Chen
Date: Tue Aug 04 2020 - 04:13:50 EST


On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 03:53:51PM +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote:

> > > /* Check if the opposite FRDE is also disabled */
> > > regmap_read(sai->regmap, FSL_SAI_xCSR(!tx, ofs), &xcsr);
> > > + if (sai->synchronous[tx] && !sai->synchronous[!tx] && !(xcsr & FSL_SAI_CSR_FRDE))
> > > + fsl_sai_config_disable(sai, !tx);
> >
> > > + if (sai->synchronous[tx] || !sai->synchronous[!tx] || !(xcsr & FSL_SAI_CSR_FRDE))
> > > + fsl_sai_config_disable(sai, tx);
> >
> > The first "||" should probably be "&&".
>
> No. it is !(!sai->synchronous[tx] && sai->synchronous[!tx] && (xcsr &
> FSL_SAI_CSR_FRDE))
> so then convert to
> (sai->synchronous[tx] || !sai->synchronous[!tx] || !(xcsr & FSL_SAI_CSR_FRDE))
>
> if change to &&, then it won't work for:
> sai->synchronous[tx] = false, sai->synchronous[!tx]=false.

Ahh..probably should be
if (!(sync[dir] && !sync[adir]) || !frde)

I have a (seemingly) correct version in my sample code.

And...please untangle the logic using the given example -- adding
helper function(s) and comments. And, though the driver does have
places using array[tx] and array[!tx], better not to use any more
boolean type variable as an array index, as it's hard to read.