Re: [PATCH v5 9/9] RISC-V: Add page table dump support for uefi

From: Anup Patel
Date: Thu Aug 13 2020 - 05:02:58 EST


On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 5:18 AM Atish Patra <atish.patra@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Extend the current page table dump support in RISC-V to include efi
> pages as well.
>
> Here is the output of efi runtime page table mappings.
>
> ---[ UEFI runtime start ]---
> 0x0000000020002000-0x0000000020003000 0x00000000be732000 4K PTE D A . . . W R V
> 0x0000000020018000-0x0000000020019000 0x00000000be738000 4K PTE D A . . . W R V
> 0x000000002002c000-0x000000002002d000 0x00000000be73c000 4K PTE D A . . . W R V
> 0x0000000020031000-0x0000000020032000 0x00000000bff61000 4K PTE D A . . X W R V
> ---[ UEFI runtime end ]---
>
> Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/riscv/mm/ptdump.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/ptdump.c b/arch/riscv/mm/ptdump.c
> index 0831c2e61a8f..ace74dec7492 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/mm/ptdump.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/mm/ptdump.c
> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
> * Copyright (C) 2019 SiFive
> */
>
> +#include <linux/efi.h>
> #include <linux/init.h>
> #include <linux/debugfs.h>
> #include <linux/seq_file.h>
> @@ -49,6 +50,14 @@ struct addr_marker {
> const char *name;
> };
>
> +/* Private information for debugfs */
> +struct ptd_mm_info {
> + struct mm_struct *mm;
> + const struct addr_marker *markers;
> + unsigned long base_addr;
> + unsigned long end;
> +};
> +
> static struct addr_marker address_markers[] = {
> #ifdef CONFIG_KASAN
> {KASAN_SHADOW_START, "Kasan shadow start"},
> @@ -68,6 +77,28 @@ static struct addr_marker address_markers[] = {
> {-1, NULL},
> };
>
> +static struct ptd_mm_info kernel_ptd_info = {
> + .mm = &init_mm,
> + .markers = address_markers,
> + .base_addr = KERN_VIRT_START,
> + .end = ULONG_MAX,
> +};
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_EFI
> +static struct addr_marker efi_addr_markers[] = {
> + { 0, "UEFI runtime start" },
> + { SZ_1G, "UEFI runtime end" },
> + { -1, NULL }
> +};
> +
> +static struct ptd_mm_info efi_ptd_info = {
> + .mm = &efi_mm,
> + .markers = efi_addr_markers,
> + .base_addr = 0,
> + .end = SZ_2G,
> +};
> +#endif
> +
> /* Page Table Entry */
> struct prot_bits {
> u64 mask;
> @@ -245,22 +276,22 @@ static void note_page(struct ptdump_state *pt_st, unsigned long addr,
> }
> }
>
> -static void ptdump_walk(struct seq_file *s)
> +static void ptdump_walk(struct seq_file *s, struct ptd_mm_info *pinfo)
> {
> struct pg_state st = {
> .seq = s,
> - .marker = address_markers,
> + .marker = pinfo->markers,
> .level = -1,
> .ptdump = {
> .note_page = note_page,
> .range = (struct ptdump_range[]) {
> - {KERN_VIRT_START, ULONG_MAX},
> + {pinfo->base_addr, pinfo->end},
> {0, 0}
> }
> }
> };
>
> - ptdump_walk_pgd(&st.ptdump, &init_mm, NULL);
> + ptdump_walk_pgd(&st.ptdump, pinfo->mm, NULL);
> }
>
> void ptdump_check_wx(void)
> @@ -293,7 +324,7 @@ void ptdump_check_wx(void)
>
> static int ptdump_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
> {
> - ptdump_walk(m);
> + ptdump_walk(m, m->private);
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -308,8 +339,13 @@ static int ptdump_init(void)
> for (j = 0; j < ARRAY_SIZE(pte_bits); j++)
> pg_level[i].mask |= pte_bits[j].mask;
>
> - debugfs_create_file("kernel_page_tables", 0400, NULL, NULL,
> + debugfs_create_file("kernel_page_tables", 0400, NULL, &kernel_ptd_info,
> &ptdump_fops);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_EFI
> + if (efi_enabled(EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES))
> + debugfs_create_file("efi_page_tables", 0400, NULL, &efi_ptd_info,
> + &ptdump_fops);
> +#endif
>
> return 0;
> }
> --
> 2.24.0
>

Looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Regards,
Anup