Re: [GIT PULL] tee subsystem pin_user_pages for v5.8

[Jens Wiklander]

On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 11:19 PM Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 12:58 PM John Hubbard <jhubbard@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On 8/21/20 11:49 AM, Olof Johansson wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 03:12:59PM +0200, Jens Wiklander wrote:
> > >> Hello arm-soc maintainers,
> > >>
> > >> Please pull this small patch converting the tee subsystem to use
> > >> pin_user_pages() instead of get_user_pages().
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> Jens
> > >>
> > >> The following changes since commit ae83d0b416db002fe95601e7f97f64b59514d936:
> > >>
> > >>    Linux 5.7-rc2 (2020-04-19 14:35:30 -0700)
> > >>
> > >> are available in the Git repository at:
> > >>
> > >>    git://git.linaro.org:/people/jens.wiklander/linux-tee.git tags/tee-pin-user-pages-for-5.8
> > >>
> > >> for you to fetch changes up to 37f6b4d5f47b600ec4ab6682c005a44a1bfca530:
> > >>
> > >>    tee: convert get_user_pages() --> pin_user_pages() (2020-05-26 10:42:41 +0200)
> > >
> > > Hi, I noticed this never got merged, but I don't see any follow-up here that
> > > retracts it. Is it still pending merge such that I should queue it for v5.10?
> > >
> >
> > I think so. I had marked it in my notes as "accepted, and the maintainer will
> > eventually merge it", and I left it at that. It's still desirable.
> >
>
> Looks like it conflicts with some of the later work. Jens, given the
> timelines here it's probably easiest all around if you rebase/respin
> and send a fresh pull request. I could fix it up but you'd still need
> to review that so the amount of work is probably less if you do it
> directly.

Agree, I'll send a fresh pull request once we have this rebased.
The conflict is with the recently added call to get_kernel_pages()
when kernel memory is shared.
The conflict isn't trivial, I guess we need to handle the different
types of pages differently when releasing them.
John, would you mind rebasing and posting the patch again?

Thanks,
Jens