Re: [PATCH] PCI/ASPM: Enable ASPM for links under VMD domain

From: Kai-Heng Feng
Date: Wed Aug 26 2020 - 01:54:13 EST




> On Aug 25, 2020, at 14:56, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 02:39:55PM +0800, Kai Heng Feng wrote:
>> Hi Christoph,
>>
>>> On Aug 25, 2020, at 2:23 PM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 08:32:20PM +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote:
>>>> New Intel laptops with VMD cannot reach deeper power saving state,
>>>> renders very short battery time.
>>>
>>> So what about just disabling VMD given how bloody pointless it is?
>>> Hasn't anyone learned from the AHCI remapping debacle?
>>>
>>> I'm really pissed at all this pointless crap intel comes up with just
>>> to make life hard for absolutely no gain. Is it so hard to just leave
>>> a NVMe device as a standard NVMe device instead of f*^&ing everything
>>> up in the chipset to make OS support a pain and I/O slower than by
>>> doing nothing?
>>
>> From what I can see from the hardwares at my hand, VMD only enables a PCI domain and PCI bridges behind it.
>>
>> NVMe works as a regular NVMe under those bridges. No magic remapping happens here.
>
> It definitively is less bad than the AHCI remapping, that is for sure.
>
> But it still requires:
>
> - a new OS driver just to mak the PCIe device show up
> - indirections in the irq handling
> - indirections in the DMA handling
> - hacks for ASPSM
> - hacks for X (there were a few more)
>
> while adding absolutely no value. Basically we have to add a large
> chunk of kernel code just to undo silicone/firmware Intel added to their
> platform to make things complicated. I mean it is their platform and if
> they want a "make things complicated" option that is fine, but it should
> not be on by default.

Yes, I do want it to be a regular PCIe bridge... but it's not the reality here.
Almost all next-gen Intel laptops will have VMD enabled, so users are forced to have it.
I would really like to have this patch in upstream instead of carrying it as a downstream distro-only patch.

Kai-Heng