Re: [PATCH] sparse: use static inline for __chk_{user,io}_ptr()

[Miguel Ojeda]

Hi Luc,

On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 10:15 PM Luc Van Oostenryck
<luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> But to the bot, any change to the content of the warning itself
> or its associated info is presented as a new warning.
> I've talked to the bot's guys about this problem and they've
> replied that they're seriously considering to change this behaviour.

I see! Well, I guess having a "false positive" is OK in that case. It
makes us look twice.

Thanks, queued!

Cheers,
Miguel