Re: 答复: [PATCH v2 6/6] drm/panel: Add Ilitek ILI9341 DBI panel driver

From: Paul Cercueil
Date: Sun Aug 30 2020 - 12:56:52 EST


Hi Leon,

Le dim. 30 août 2020 à 16:36, 何小龙 (Leon He) <Leon.He@xxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
+struct ili9341 {
+ struct drm_panel panel;
+ struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi;
+ const struct ili9341_pdata *pdata;
+
+ struct gpio_desc *reset_gpiod;
+ u32 rotation;
+};
+

Hi Paul, you put the mipi_dsi_device inside the struct. I think it maybe not
a good idea. That means the panel has a MIPI-DSI interface but it doesn't
have actually.

+static int ili9341_probe(struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi)
+{
+ struct device *dev = &dsi->dev;
+ struct ili9341 *priv;
+ int ret;
+
+ /* See comment for mipi_dbi_spi_init() */
+ if (!dev->coherent_dma_mask) {
+ ret = dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_warn(dev, "Failed to set dma mask %d\n", ret);
+ return ret;
+ }
+ }
+
+ priv = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!priv)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ mipi_dsi_set_drvdata(dsi, priv);
+ priv->dsi = dsi;
+
+ device_property_read_u32(dev, "rotation", &priv->rotation);
+
+ priv->pdata = device_get_match_data(dev);
+ if (!priv->pdata)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ drm_panel_init(&priv->panel, dev, &ili9341_funcs,
+ DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_DPI);
+
+ priv->reset_gpiod = devm_gpiod_get(dev, "reset", GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
+ if (IS_ERR(priv->reset_gpiod)) {
+ dev_err(dev, "Couldn't get our reset GPIO\n");
+ return PTR_ERR(priv->reset_gpiod);
+ }
+
+ ret = drm_panel_of_backlight(&priv->panel);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
+ dev_err(dev, "Failed to get backlight handle\n");
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ drm_panel_add(&priv->panel);
+
+ dsi->bus_type = priv->pdata->bus_type;
+ dsi->lanes = priv->pdata->lanes;
+ dsi->format = MIPI_DSI_FMT_RGB565;
+
+ ret = mipi_dsi_attach(dsi);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(dev, "Failed to attach DSI panel\n");
+ goto err_panel_remove;
+ }
+
+ ret = mipi_dsi_maybe_register_tiny_driver(dsi);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(dev, "Failed to init TinyDRM driver\n");
+ goto err_mipi_dsi_detach;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+
+err_mipi_dsi_detach:
+ mipi_dsi_detach(dsi);
+err_panel_remove:
+ drm_panel_remove(&priv->panel);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static int ili9341_remove(struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi)
+{
+ struct ili9341 *priv = mipi_dsi_get_drvdata(dsi);
+
+ mipi_dsi_detach(dsi);
+ drm_panel_remove(&priv->panel);
+
+ drm_panel_disable(&priv->panel);
+ drm_panel_unprepare(&priv->panel);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct ili9341_pdata yx240qv29_pdata = {
+ .mode = { DRM_SIMPLE_MODE(240, 320, 37, 49) },
+ .width_mm = 0, // TODO
+ .height_mm = 0, // TODO
+ .bus_type = MIPI_DCS_BUS_TYPE_DBI_SPI_C3,
+ .lanes = 1,
+};
+
+static const struct of_device_id ili9341_of_match[] = {
+ { .compatible = "adafruit,yx240qv29", .data = &yx240qv29_pdata },
+ { }
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ili9341_of_match);
+
+static struct mipi_dsi_driver ili9341_dsi_driver = {
+ .probe = ili9341_probe,
+ .remove = ili9341_remove,
+ .driver = {
+ .name = "ili9341-dsi",
+ .of_match_table = ili9341_of_match,
+ },
+};
+module_mipi_dsi_driver(ili9341_dsi_driver);

Again, you treat this driver as a mipi dsi driver but for a MIPI-DBI (I8080/SPI)
panel device. That will make developers confused.

Is it possible to just add a mipi_dbi_driver for I8080/SPI interface panel?
Thanks!

Please read the cover letter, it explains why it's done this way. The whole point of this patchset is to merge DSI and DBI frameworks in a way that can be maintained.

Cheers,
-Paul