Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 2 (lib/ubsan.c)

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi Randy,

On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 07:38:31 -0700 Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 9/4/20 12:59 AM, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 11:12 PM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:  
> >>
> >> On 9/2/20 8:44 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:  
> >>> On 9/2/20 1:09 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:  
> >>>> Hi all,
> >>>>
> >>>> Changes since 20200828:
> >>>>  
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> on i386:
> >>>
> >>> ../lib/ubsan.c: In function ‘ubsan_prologue’:
> >>> ../lib/ubsan.c:141:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘kunit_fail_current_test’; did you mean ‘kunit_init_test’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> >>>   kunit_fail_current_test();
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Full randconfig file is attached.
> >>>  
> >>
> >> Hi Brendan,
> >>
> >> Do you know anything about this build error?
> >>
> >> I can't find kunit_fail_current_test() anywhere.  
> > 
> > Yeah, this got applied for some reason without the prerequisite
> > patches. It is from a two patch series, the other being here:
> > 
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20200813205722.1384108-1-urielguajardojr@xxxxxxxxx/
> > 
> > which in turn depends on another patchset which didn't make it into 5.9.
> > 
> > Again, I don't know why this was applied without it's prereqs. Sorry about that.
> >   
> 
> Well.  Who is responsible for this small mess?
> It is still killing linux-next builds for me (2020-0908).

It came in via the kunit-next tree (Shuah cc'd).  I will revert commit
abe83f7621ee ("kunit: ubsan integration") today.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Attachment: pgpgaWFZAE_VK.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature