Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 2 (lib/ubsan.c)

[Shuah Khan]

On 9/8/20 6:49 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 9/8/20 5:46 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Randy,
> >
> > On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 07:38:31 -0700 Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On 9/4/20 12:59 AM, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 11:12 PM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > On 9/2/20 8:44 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > > > > > On 9/2/20 1:09 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Changes since 20200828:
> > > > > > >   
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > on i386:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ../lib/ubsan.c: In function ‘ubsan_prologue’:
> > > > > > ../lib/ubsan.c:141:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘kunit_fail_current_test’; did you mean ‘kunit_init_test’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > > > > >    kunit_fail_current_test();
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Full randconfig file is attached.
> > > > > >   
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Brendan,
> > > > >
> > > > > Do you know anything about this build error?
> > > > >
> > > > > I can't find kunit_fail_current_test() anywhere.
> > > >
> > > > Yeah, this got applied for some reason without the prerequisite
> > > > patches. It is from a two patch series, the other being here:
> > > >
> > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20200813205722.1384108-1-urielguajardojr@xxxxxxxxx/
> > > >
> > > > which in turn depends on another patchset which didn't make it into 5.9.
> > > >
> > > > Again, I don't know why this was applied without it's prereqs. Sorry about that.
> > > >    
> > >
> > > Well.  Who is responsible for this small mess?
> > > It is still killing linux-next builds for me (2020-0908).
> >
> > It came in via the kunit-next tree (Shuah cc'd).  I will revert commit
> > abe83f7621ee ("kunit: ubsan integration") today.

Sorry about that. I picked this up for 5.10 since it had the reviewed
by tags from Brendan.

I will drop this from kselftest kunit

thanks,
-- Shuah