Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: net: Correct interrupt flags in examples

From: Rob Herring
Date: Tue Sep 15 2020 - 13:31:53 EST


On Tue, 08 Sep 2020 16:59:39 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> GPIO_ACTIVE_x flags are not correct in the context of interrupt flags.
> These are simple defines so they could be used in DTS but they will not
> have the same meaning:
> 1. GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH = 0 = IRQ_TYPE_NONE
> 2. GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW = 1 = IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING
>
> Correct the interrupt flags, assuming the author of the code wanted some
> logical behavior behind the name "ACTIVE_xxx", this is:
> ACTIVE_LOW => IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW
> ACTIVE_HIGH => IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/tcan4x5x.txt | 2 +-
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/nfc/nxp-nci.txt | 2 +-
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/nfc/pn544.txt | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>

Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>