Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] ASoC: tlv320adcx140: Add proper support for master mode

From: Camel Guo
Date: Wed Sep 16 2020 - 03:52:55 EST


Please forget about this patch since Dan will upload a similar one.

@Dan, see my comment below.

On 9/15/20 8:50 PM, Dan Murphy wrote:
Camel

On 9/11/20 3:07 AM, Camel Guo wrote:
From: Camel Guo <camelg@xxxxxxxx>

Add setup of bclk-to-ws ratio and sample rate when in master mode,
as well as MCLK input pin setup.

Signed-off-by: Camel Guo <camelg@xxxxxxxx>
---
   v2:
    - Move GPIO setting into devicetree
    - Move master config register setting into a new function

   sound/soc/codecs/tlv320adcx140.c | 139 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
   sound/soc/codecs/tlv320adcx140.h |  27 ++++++
   2 files changed, 162 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/tlv320adcx140.c b/sound/soc/codecs/tlv320adcx140.c
index 97f16fbba441..685f5fd8b537 100644
--- a/sound/soc/codecs/tlv320adcx140.c
+++ b/sound/soc/codecs/tlv320adcx140.c
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ struct adcx140_priv {
        unsigned int dai_fmt;
        unsigned int tdm_delay;
        unsigned int slot_width;
+     bool master;
   };
   static const char * const gpo_config_names[] = {
@@ -651,11 +652,136 @@ static int adcx140_reset(struct adcx140_priv *adcx140)
        return ret;
   }
+static int adcx140_fs_bclk_ratio(unsigned int bclk_ratio)
+{
+     switch (bclk_ratio) {
+     case 16:
+             return ADCX140_RATIO_16;
+     case 24:
+             return ADCX140_RATIO_24;
+     case 32:
+             return ADCX140_RATIO_32;
+     case 48:
+             return ADCX140_RATIO_48;
+     case 64:
+             return ADCX140_RATIO_64;
+     case 96:
+             return ADCX140_RATIO_96;
+     case 128:
+             return ADCX140_RATIO_128;
+     case 192:
+             return ADCX140_RATIO_192;
+     case 256:
+             return ADCX140_RATIO_256;
+     case 384:
+             return ADCX140_RATIO_384;
+     case 512:
+             return ADCX140_RATIO_512;
+     case 1024:
+             return ADCX140_RATIO_1024;
+     case 2048:
+             return ADCX140_RATIO_2048;
+     default:
+             break;
+     }
+     return -EINVAL;
+}
+
+static int adcx140_fs_rate(unsigned int rate)
+{
+     switch (rate) {
+     case 7350:
+     case 8000:
+             return ADCX140_8_OR_7_35KHZ;
+     case 14700:
+     case 16000:
+             return ADCX140_16_OR_14_7KHZ;
+     case 22050:
+     case 24000:
+             return ADCX140_24_OR_22_05KHZ;
+     case 29400:
+     case 32000:
+             return ADCX140_32_OR_29_4KHZ;
+     case 44100:
+     case 48000:
+             return ADCX140_48_OR_44_1KHZ;
+     case 88200:
+     case 96000:
+             return ADCX140_96_OR_88_2KHZ;
+     case 176400:
+     case 192000:
+             return ADCX140_192_OR_176_4KHZ;
+     case 352800:
+     case 384000:
+             return ADCX140_384_OR_352_8KHZ;
+     case 705600:
+     case 768000:
+             return ADCX140_768_OR_705_6KHZ;
+     default:
+             break;
+     }
+     return -EINVAL;
+}
+
+static int adcx140_setup_master_config(struct snd_soc_component *component,
+                                    struct snd_pcm_hw_params *params)
+{
+     int ret = 0;
+     struct adcx140_priv *adcx140 = snd_soc_component_get_drvdata(component);
+
+     if (adcx140->master) {

Move this out to hw_params.  No reason to jump here just to jump back.

Check for master and if master then configure

This will eliminate the mixed code and variable declaration below which
is what I wanted to avoid in v1.

This will also allow you to remove some of the variable initialization.

+             u8 mst_cfg1 = 0;
+             u8 mst_cfg0 = 0;
This can be init to mst_cfg0 = ADCX140_BCLK_FSYNC_MASTER no reason to
set it here and then change it immediately.
+             unsigned int bclk_ratio;
+
+             mst_cfg0 = ADCX140_BCLK_FSYNC_MASTER;
+             if (params_rate(params) % 1000)
+                     mst_cfg0 |= ADCX140_FSYNCINV_BIT; /* 44.1 kHz et al */
+
+             ret = adcx140_fs_rate(params_rate(params));
+             if (ret < 0) {
+                     dev_err(adcx140->dev, "%s: Unsupported rate %d\n",
+                                     __func__, params_rate(params));
+                     return ret;
+             }
+             mst_cfg1 |= ret;
Why the | here?  This is initialized to 0 so mst_cfg1 = ret. And why
even use ret just return into mst_cfg1 and check that variable
+
+             /* In slave mode when using automatic clock configuration,
+              * the codec figures out the BCLK to FSYNC ratio itself. But
+              * here in master mode, we need to tell it.
+              */
+
+             bclk_ratio = snd_soc_params_to_frame_size(params);
+             ret = adcx140_fs_bclk_ratio(bclk_ratio);
+             if (ret < 0) {
+                     dev_err(adcx140->dev, "%s: Unsupported bclk_ratio %d\n",
+                                     __func__, bclk_ratio);
+                     return ret;
+             }
+             mst_cfg1 |= ret;
+
+             snd_soc_component_update_bits(component, ADCX140_MST_CFG1,
+                             ADCX140_FS_RATE_MSK |
+                             ADCX140_RATIO_MSK,
+                             mst_cfg1);

I don't understand the update_bits since you have calcualted both the
Ratio and rate you can just write the register with the
snd_soc_component_write.

+
+             snd_soc_component_update_bits(component, ADCX140_MST_CFG0,
+                             ADCX140_FSYNCINV_BIT |
+                             ADCX140_BCLK_FSYNC_MASTER,
+                             mst_cfg0);
+

But this is ok.  I actually have other changes I am posting which move
this to the set_dai_format.  So I am not sure if this will be needed
after that patch is applied.

Maybe I can just wait for your patch. If it can make master mode work, there is no need for me to work on this one.


I will CC you on those patches.

Dan