Re: [PATCH -next] fpga: dfl: Make m10_n3000_info static

[Yuehaibing]

On 2020/9/17 0:10, Moritz Fischer wrote:
> Hi Yue,
> 
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 10:25:36PM +0800, YueHaibing wrote:
>> Fix sparse warning:
>>
>> drivers/fpga/dfl-n3000-nios.c:392:23: warning:
>>  symbol 'm10_n3000_info' was not declared. Should it be static?
>>
>> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  drivers/fpga/dfl-n3000-nios.c | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/fpga/dfl-n3000-nios.c b/drivers/fpga/dfl-n3000-nios.c
>> index 5088f8f0e0cd..686813b59d33 100644
>> --- a/drivers/fpga/dfl-n3000-nios.c
>> +++ b/drivers/fpga/dfl-n3000-nios.c
>> @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ static int n3000_nios_init_done_check(struct n3000_nios *ns)
>>  	return ret;
>>  }
>>  
>> -struct spi_board_info m10_n3000_info = {
>> +static struct spi_board_info m10_n3000_info = {
>>  	.modalias = "m10-n3000",
>>  	.max_speed_hz = 12500000,
>>  	.bus_num = 0,
>> -- 
>> 2.17.1
>>
> Can you resend this with a [PATCH v2] or [PATCH v2 next], neither
> lore nor patchwork picks it up in its current form.
> 
> This'll make sure it doesn't get lost.
> 
> While at it could you change the first line to:
> 
> "fpga: dfl: n3000-nios: Make m10_n3000_info static"

Sure, will resend.
> 
> Thanks for the patch,
> Moritz
> .
>