Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: vendor-prefixes: favor "gateworks" over "gw"

From: Linus Walleij
Date: Sun Oct 04 2020 - 15:47:58 EST

Next message: Randy Dunlap: "Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] overlayfs: add ioctls that allows to get fhandle for layers dentries"
Previous message: Rikard Falkeborn: "[PATCH 3/3] power: supply: Constify static w1_family_ops structs"
In reply to: Krzysztof Kozlowski: "[PATCH] dt-bindings: vendor-prefixes: favor "gateworks" over "gw""
Next in thread: Rob Herring: "Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: vendor-prefixes: favor "gateworks" over "gw""
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sat, Oct 3, 2020 at 12:33 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> There are two vendor prefixes for Gateworks: "gw" and "gateworks".
> Favor the longer one (more descriptive) and mark "gw" as deprecated so
> it will not be used in new bindings.
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Next message: Randy Dunlap: "Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] overlayfs: add ioctls that allows to get fhandle for layers dentries"
Previous message: Rikard Falkeborn: "[PATCH 3/3] power: supply: Constify static w1_family_ops structs"
In reply to: Krzysztof Kozlowski: "[PATCH] dt-bindings: vendor-prefixes: favor "gateworks" over "gw""
Next in thread: Rob Herring: "Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: vendor-prefixes: favor "gateworks" over "gw""
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]