Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: Add missing 'unevaluatedProperties'

[Ulf Hansson]

On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 at 20:38, Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> This doesn't yet do anything in the tools, but make it explicit so we can
> check either 'unevaluatedProperties' or 'additionalProperties' is present
> in schemas.
>
> 'unevaluatedProperties' is appropriate when including another schema (via
> '$ref') and all possible properties and/or child nodes are not
> explicitly listed in the schema with the '$ref'.
>
> This is in preparation to add a meta-schema to check for missing
> 'unevaluatedProperties' or 'additionalProperties'. This has been a
> constant source of review issues.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

[...]

>  .../devicetree/bindings/mmc/amlogic,meson-mx-sdhc.yaml       | 2 ++
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/cdns,sdhci.yaml        | 2 ++
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/ingenic,mmc.yaml       | 2 ++
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/owl-mmc.yaml           | 2 ++
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/rockchip-dw-mshc.yaml  | 2 ++
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-pxa.yaml         | 2 ++
>  .../devicetree/bindings/mmc/socionext,uniphier-sd.yaml       | 2 ++
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/synopsys-dw-mshc.yaml  | 2 ++

For mmc:

Acked-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx>

[...]

Kind regards
Uffe