Re: [PATCH 10/10] rpmsg: ns: Make Name service module transport agnostic

From: Mathieu Poirier
Date: Wed Oct 07 2020 - 13:26:42 EST


On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 09:13:27AM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 06:10:00PM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> > Make name service module transport agnostic by using the rpmsg
> > device specific byte conversion routine.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_ns.c | 10 ++++------
> > include/linux/rpmsg_ns.h | 4 ++--
> > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_ns.c b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_ns.c
> > index b3318bf84433..1df3aaadfe10 100644
> > --- a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_ns.c
> > +++ b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_ns.c
> > @@ -18,9 +18,7 @@ static int rpmsg_ns_cb(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev, void *data, int len,
> > struct rpmsg_ns_msg *msg = data;
> > struct rpmsg_device *newch;
> > struct rpmsg_channel_info chinfo;
> > - struct virtio_rpmsg_channel *vch = to_virtio_rpmsg_channel(rpdev);
> > - struct virtproc_info *vrp = vch->vrp;
> > - struct device *dev = &vrp->vdev->dev;
> > + struct device *dev = &rpdev->dev;
> > int ret;
> >
> > #if defined(CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG)
> > @@ -38,13 +36,13 @@ static int rpmsg_ns_cb(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev, void *data, int len,
> >
> > strncpy(chinfo.name, msg->name, sizeof(chinfo.name));
> > chinfo.src = RPMSG_ADDR_ANY;
> > - chinfo.dst = virtio32_to_cpu(vrp->vdev, msg->addr);
> > + chinfo.dst = rpmsg32_to_cpu(rpdev, msg->addr);
> >
> > dev_info(dev, "%sing channel %s addr 0x%x\n",
> > - virtio32_to_cpu(vrp->vdev, msg->flags) & RPMSG_NS_DESTROY ?
> > + rpmsg32_to_cpu(rpdev, msg->flags) & RPMSG_NS_DESTROY ?
> > "destroy" : "creat", msg->name, chinfo.dst);
> >
> > - if (virtio32_to_cpu(vrp->vdev, msg->flags) & RPMSG_NS_DESTROY) {
> > + if (rpmsg32_to_cpu(rpdev, msg->flags) & RPMSG_NS_DESTROY) {
> > ret = rpmsg_release_channel(rpdev, &chinfo);
> > if (ret)
> > dev_err(dev, "rpmsg_destroy_channel failed: %d\n", ret);
> > diff --git a/include/linux/rpmsg_ns.h b/include/linux/rpmsg_ns.h
> > index aabc6c3c0d6d..9f3030b2145b 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/rpmsg_ns.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/rpmsg_ns.h
> > @@ -41,8 +41,8 @@ struct rpmsg_hdr {
> > */
> > struct rpmsg_ns_msg {
> > char name[RPMSG_NAME_SIZE];
> > - __virtio32 addr;
> > - __virtio32 flags;
> > + u32 addr;
> > + u32 flags;
>
> These aren't (necessarily) native endianness, right? Don't they deserve a
> separate type? __rpmsg32?
>

I kept them as u32 type to be as generic as possible and let the endianness
conversion callback do the work. Making them a __rpmsg32 is a good idea, it
would force a proper implementation.

> Thanks
> Guennadi
>
> > } __packed;
> >
> > /**
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >