Re: [PATCH] seqlock: avoid -Wshadow warnings

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 05:50:38PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

> -	unsigned seq;							\
> +	unsigned __seq;							\

> -	unsigned seq = __read_seqcount_begin(s);			\
> +	unsigned _seq = __read_seqcount_begin(s);			\

> -	unsigned seq = __seqcount_sequence(s);				\
> +	unsigned __seq = __seqcount_sequence(s);			\

Can we have a consistent number of leading '_' ?

Also, I suppose you're going to find the explicit shadow in
___wait_event(), that one's not going to be trivial to fix.