Re: [PATCH 4/5] dt-bindings: memory: tegra: Add missing swgroups

From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Date: Mon Oct 26 2020 - 16:18:06 EST


On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 08:52:18AM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 02:21:10PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 07, 2020 at 05:37:45PM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> > > According to Tegra X1 TRM, there are missing swgroups in the
> > > tegra210_swgroups list. So this patch adds them in bindings.
> > >
> > > Note that the TEGRA_SWGROUP_GPU (in list) should be actually
> > > TEGRA_SWGROUP_GPUB (in TRM), yet TEGRA_SWGROUP_GPU (in TRM)
> > > is not being used -- only TEGRA_SWGROUP_GPUB (in TRM) is. So
> > > this patch does not add TEGRA_SWGROUP_GPU (in TRM) and keeps
> > > TEGRA_SWGROUP_GPU (in list) as it is.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > include/dt-bindings/memory/tegra210-mc.h | 10 ++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/memory/tegra210-mc.h b/include/dt-bindings/memory/tegra210-mc.h
> > > index c226cba9e077..f9fcb18a6d9b 100644
> > > --- a/include/dt-bindings/memory/tegra210-mc.h
> > > +++ b/include/dt-bindings/memory/tegra210-mc.h
> > > @@ -33,6 +33,16 @@
> > > #define TEGRA_SWGROUP_AXIAP 28
> > > #define TEGRA_SWGROUP_ETR 29
> > > #define TEGRA_SWGROUP_TSECB 30
> > > +#define TEGRA_SWGROUP_NV 31
> > > +#define TEGRA_SWGROUP_NV2 32
> > > +#define TEGRA_SWGROUP_PPCS1 33
> > > +#define TEGRA_SWGROUP_DC1 34
> > > +#define TEGRA_SWGROUP_PPCS2 35
> > > +#define TEGRA_SWGROUP_HC1 36
> > > +#define TEGRA_SWGROUP_SE1 37
> > > +#define TEGRA_SWGROUP_TSEC1 38
> > > +#define TEGRA_SWGROUP_TSECB1 39
> > > +#define TEGRA_SWGROUP_NVDEC1 40
> >
> > I'm not sure this is right. The existing list is based on "Table 4:
> > Client to Software Name Mapping" from page 28 of the Tegra X1 TRM, and
> > none of these new swgroups seem to be present in that table.
>
> I went through all the MC_SMMU_XX_ASID_0 registers. All of
> them have their own ASID registers that I added in PATCH-5.

Thierry,

Any follow ups on this topic? Does it require a fix or looks correct?

Best regards,
Krzysztof