Re: [v2 01/11] irqchip: ls-extirq: Add LS1043A, LS1088A external interrupt

[Rasmus Villemoes]

On 27/10/2020 05.46, Biwen Li wrote:
> From: Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou@xxxxxxx>
> 
> Add an new IRQ chip declaration for LS1043A and LS1088A
> - compatible "fsl,ls1043a-extirq" for LS1043A, LS1046A. SCFG_INTPCR[31:0]
>   of these SoCs is stored/read as SCFG_INTPCR[0:31] defaultly(bit
>   reverse)

s/defaultly/by default/ I suppose. But what does that mean? Is it still
configurable, just now through some undocumented register? If that
register still exists, does it now have a reset value of all-ones as
opposed to the ls1021 case? If it's not configurable, then describing
the situation as "by default" is confusing and wrong, it should just say
"On LS1043A, LS1046A, SCFG_INTPCR is stored/read bit-reversed."


> - compatible "fsl,ls1088a-extirq" for LS1088A, LS208xA, LX216xA
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Biwen Li <biwen.li@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> Change in v2:
> 	- add despcription of bit reverse
> 	- update copyright
> 
>  drivers/irqchip/irq-ls-extirq.c | 10 +++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-ls-extirq.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-ls-extirq.c
> index 4d1179fed77c..9587bc2607fc 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-ls-extirq.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-ls-extirq.c
> @@ -1,5 +1,8 @@
>  // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> -
> +/*
> + * Author: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

If I wanted my name splattered all over the files I touch or add, I'd
add it myself, TYVM. The git history is plenty fine for recording
authorship as far as I'm concerned, and I absolutely abhor having to
skip over any kind of legalese boilerplate when opening a file.

Rasmus