Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] leds: lgm: Add LED controller driver for LGM Soc

[Pavel Machek]

Hi!

> diff --git a/drivers/leds/Kconfig b/drivers/leds/Kconfig
> index ed943140e1fd..6445b39fe4fc 100644
> --- a/drivers/leds/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/leds/Kconfig
> @@ -886,6 +886,16 @@ config LEDS_SGM3140
>  	  This option enables support for the SGM3140 500mA Buck/Boost Charge
>  	  Pump LED Driver.
>  
> +config LEDS_LGM_SSO
> +	tristate "LED support for Intel LGM SOC series"
> +	depends on LEDS_CLASS
> +	depends on MFD_SYSCON
> +	depends on OF
> +	help
> +          Parallel to serial conversion, which is also called SSO controller,
> +          can drive external shift register for LED outputs.
> +	  This enables LED support for Serial Shift Output Controller(SSO).

Something is wrong with indentation here.

> diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-lgm-sso.c b/drivers/leds/leds-lgm-sso.c

Could we put it into drivers/leds/blink/ directory? You'll need to
create it.

> index 000000000000..f1bae1c6ed3c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/leds/leds-lgm-sso.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,881 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * Intel LGM Soc LED SSO driver

Spell out LGM, SSO. Soc->SoC.

Pointer to documentation would be welcome here.

> +enum {
> +	US_SW = 0,
> +	US_GPTC = 1,
> +	US_FPID = 2
> +};

This is not really useful without additional comments.

> +static u32 sso_rectify_brightness(u32 brightness)
> +{
> +	if (brightness > LED_FULL)
> +		return LED_FULL;
> +	else
> +		return brightness;
> +}

Why?

> +static int sso_rectify_blink_rate(struct sso_led_priv *priv, u32 rate)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < MAX_FREQ_RANK; i++) {
> +		if (rate <= priv->freq[i])
> +			return i;
> +	}
> +
> +	return i - 1;
> +}

Can return -1. Is that expected?

> +
> +		desc->np = to_of_node(fwnode_child);
> +		if (fwnode_property_read_string(fwnode_child, "label",
> +						&desc->name)) {
> +			dev_err(dev, "LED no label name!\n");
> +			goto __dt_err;
> +		}

Can you use appropriate helper from the core? labels are getting
deprecated...


> +		if (fwnode_property_present(fwnode_child,
> +					    "retain-state-suspended"))
> +			desc->retain_state_suspended = 1;

Was this documented in the binding?

> +		if (fwnode_property_read_u32(fwnode_child, "intel,led-pin",
> +					     &prop)) {
> +			dev_err(dev, "Failed to find led pin id!\n");
> +			goto __dt_err;

Would not we normally use something like reg = <x> to indicate pin?

> +		if (fwnode_property_present(fwnode_child,
> +					    "intel,sso-hw-trigger"))
> +			desc->hw_trig = 1;

Should not that be selectable on runtime?

> +		if (fwnode_property_read_u32(fwnode_child,
> +					     "intel,sso-brightness", &prop))
> +			desc->brightness = priv->brightness;
> +		else
> +			desc->brightness = sso_rectify_brightness(prop);

Can you look at "default-state" property?

> +	ret = sso_gpio_gc_init(dev, priv);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}

Just return ret.

> +
> +	ret = clk_prepare_enable(priv->gclk);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "Failed to prepate/enable sso gate clock!\n");
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	priv->fpid_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "fpid");
> +	if (IS_ERR(priv->fpid_clk)) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "Failed to get fpid clock!\n");
> +		return PTR_ERR(priv->fpid_clk);
> +	}

clk disable here?

> +	ret = clk_prepare_enable(priv->fpid_clk);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "Failed to prepare/enable fpid clock!\n");
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +	priv->fpid_clkrate = clk_get_rate(priv->fpid_clk);
> +
> +	priv->mmap = syscon_node_to_regmap(dev->of_node);
> +	if (IS_ERR(priv->mmap)) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "Failed to map iomem!\n");
> +		return PTR_ERR(priv->mmap);
> +	}

clk disable here? ... and probably elsewhere?

Best regards,
							Pavel
-- 
http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature