Re: [PATCH 00/19] [Set 1] Rid W=1 warnings from GPU

[Lee Jones]

On Thu, 05 Nov 2020, Thierry Reding wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 02:44:58PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > This set is part of a larger effort attempting to clean-up W=1
> > kernel builds, which are currently overwhelmingly riddled with
> > niggly little warnings.
> > 
> > There are 5000 warnings to work through.
> > 
> > It will take a couple more sets.
> > 
> > Lee Jones (19):
> >   gpu: host1x: bus: Add missing description for 'driver'
> >   gpu: ipu-v3: ipu-di: Strip out 2 unused 'di_sync_config' entries
> >   gpu: drm: imx: ipuv3-plane: Mark 'crtc_state' as __always_unused
> >   gpu: drm: omapdrm: omap_irq: Fix a couple of doc-rot issues
> >   gpu: drm: selftests: test-drm_mm: Mark 'hole_end' as always_unused
> >   gpu: drm: scheduler: sched_main: Provide missing description for
> >     'sched' paramter
> >   gpu: drm: scheduler: sched_entity: Demote non-conformant kernel-doc
> >     headers
> >   gpu: drm: omapdrm: dss: dsi: Rework and remove a few unused variables
> >   gpu: drm: selftests: test-drm_framebuffer: Remove set but unused
> >     variable 'fb'
> >   gpu: drm: ttm: ttm_bo: Fix one function header - demote lots of
> >     kernel-doc abuses
> >   gpu: drm: panel: panel-simple: Fix 'struct panel_desc's header
> >   gpu: drm: bridge: analogix: analogix_dp_reg: Remove unused function
> >     'analogix_dp_write_byte_to_dpcd'
> >   gpu: drm: ttm: ttm_tt: Demote kernel-doc header format abuses
> >   gpu: drm: selftests: test-drm_dp_mst_helper: Place 'struct
> >     drm_dp_sideband_msg_req_body' onto the heap
> >   gpu: drm: radeon: radeon_drv: Remove unused variable 'ret'
> >   gpu: drm: panel: panel-ilitek-ili9322: Demote non-conformant
> >     kernel-doc header
> >   gpu: drm: radeon: radeon_device: Fix a bunch of kernel-doc
> >     misdemeanours
> >   gpu: drm: amd: amdgpu: amdgpu: Mark global variables as __maybe_unused
> >   gpu: drm: bridge: analogix: analogix_dp_reg: Remove unused function
> >     'analogix_dp_start_aux_transaction'
> 
> As commented on the other patches, the subject prefixes on most of these
> look wrong, but it's generally a nice cleanup.

The prefixes are automated.  I'll add this to my list of awkward
subsystems and go through them all manually again tomorrow. :D

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog