Re: [PATCH v1 00/30] Introduce core voltage scaling for NVIDIA Tegra20/30 SoCs

[Viresh Kumar]

On 09-11-20, 08:10, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> 09.11.2020 07:47, Dmitry Osipenko пишет:
> > 09.11.2020 07:43, Viresh Kumar пишет:
> >> On 08-11-20, 15:19, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> >>> I took a detailed look at the GENPD and tried to implement it. Here is
> >>> what was found:
> >>>
> >>> 1. GENPD framework doesn't aggregate performance requests from the
> >>> attached devices. This means that if deviceA requests performance state
> >>> 10 and then deviceB requests state 3, then framework will set domain's
> >>> state to 3 instead of 10.
> >>
> >> It does. Look at _genpd_reeval_performance_state().
> >>
> > 
> > Thanks, I probably had a bug in the quick prototype and then overlooked
> > that function.
> > 
> 
> If a non-hardware device-tree node is okay to have for the domain, then
> I can try again.
> 
> What I also haven't mentioned is that GENPD adds some extra complexity
> to some drivers (3d, video decoder) because we will need to handle both
> new GENPD and legacy Tegra specific pre-genpd era domains.
> 
> I'm also not exactly sure how the topology of domains should look like
> because Tegra has a power-controller (PMC) which manages power rail of a
> few hardware units. Perhaps it should be
> 
>   device -> PMC domain -> CORE domain
> 
> but not exactly sure for now.

I am also confused on if it should be a domain or regulator, but that
is for Ulf to tell :)

-- 
viresh