Re: [PATCH] soc: ti: Kconfig: Drop ARM64 SoC specific configs

[santosh . shilimkar]

On 11/12/20 2:22 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 13:59-20201112, santosh.shilimkar@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > On 11/12/20 1:56 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> > > On 14:08-20201026, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> > > > On 23:30-20201026, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
> > > > [..]
> > > > > ➜  linux git:(master) git grep -in ARCH_K3_AM6_SOC
> > > > > arch/arm64/configs/defconfig:961:CONFIG_ARCH_K3_AM6_SOC=y
> > > > > drivers/soc/ti/Kconfig:7:config ARCH_K3_AM6_SOC
> > > > > ➜  linux git:(master) git grep -in ARCH_K3_J721E_SOC
> > > > > arch/arm64/configs/defconfig:962:CONFIG_ARCH_K3_J721E_SOC=y
> > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/cadence/Kconfig:16:  depends on ARCH_K3_J721E_SOC ||
> > > > > COMPILE_TEST
> > > > > drivers/soc/ti/Kconfig:12:config ARCH_K3_J721E_SOC
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I see drm bridge Kconfig is cleaned[0]. Please clean the defconfig as well.
> > > > >
> > > > > [0]
> > > > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-kernel/patch/20201026165441.22894-1-nm@xxxxxx/__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!KWOx2aLl7hlHQrN--kiz1N5WaPWgeZzFZ12ptg8NzJE2BSnxxrWmsoqn5vjMvpfO1bSGYQ$
> > > >
> > > > Yes, the defconfig patches have to be queued up in a different queue,
> > > > Lets see where the two patches fall and will post the defconfig
> > > > updates as well.
> > >
> > >
> > > Santosh,
> > >
> > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-kernel/patch/20201026165441.22894-1-nm@xxxxxx/__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!KWOx2aLl7hlHQrN--kiz1N5WaPWgeZzFZ12ptg8NzJE2BSnxxrWmsoqn5vjMvpfO1bSGYQ$
> > > looks available in next now.
> > >
> > > Can we queue this patch[1] up for 5.11 window?
> > >
> > > Depending on your preference, I can carry the defconfig patch[2] (to
> > > prevent merge dependencies, might be good to get an immutable tag) OR
> > > you can pick the defconfig patch up that cleans after removing the
> > > symbol.
> >
> > I can apply SOC kconfig patch [1] to my soc branch. That branch with
> > some additional patches am going to send up, so it should
> > work. Let me know.
>
> OK, sounds fine to me, If you can give me a tag, I can add queue up
> defconfig on top to prevent bisect issues.
I won't be adding tag till all the commits are lineup but branch will
be immutable.

Regards.
Santosh