Re: [PATCH] arm64: abort counter_read_on_cpu() when irqs_disabled()

[Mark Rutland]

On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 03:53:28PM +0000, Ionela Voinescu wrote:
> Given that smp_call_function_single() can deadlock when interrupts are
> disabled, abort the SMP call if irqs_disabled(). This scenario is
> currently not possible given the function's uses, but safeguard this for
> potential future uses.

Sorry to contradict earlier feedback, but I think this is preferable
as-is, since smp_call_function_single() will
WARN_ON_ONCE(irqs_disabled())), but this will silently mask any dodgy
usage.

If we want a separate check here, I reckon we should wrap it with a
WARN_ON_ONCE(), and only relax that if/when we have a legitimate case
for calling this with IRQs disabled.

Thanks,
Mark.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c | 6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
> index 3a083a9a8ef2..e387188741f2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
> @@ -343,7 +343,11 @@ static void cpu_read_constcnt(void *val)
>  static inline
>  int counters_read_on_cpu(int cpu, smp_call_func_t func, u64 *val)
>  {
> -	if (!cpu_has_amu_feat(cpu))
> +	/*
> +	 * Abort call on counterless CPU or when interrupts are
> +	 * disabled - can lead to deadlock in smp sync call.
> +	 */
> +	if (!cpu_has_amu_feat(cpu) || unlikely(irqs_disabled()))
>  		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>  
>  	smp_call_function_single(cpu, func, val, 1);
> -- 
> 2.17.1
>