Re: [PATCH RFC v1 1/4] dt-bindings: net: dwmac-meson: use picoseconds for the RGMII RX delay

From: Andrew Lunn
Date: Sat Nov 14 2020 - 17:35:08 EST


On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 09:01:01PM +0100, Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
> Amlogic Meson G12A, G12B and SM1 SoCs have a more advanced RGMII RX
> delay register which allows picoseconds precision. Deprecate the old
> "amlogic,rx-delay-ns" in favour of a new "amlogic,rgmii-rx-delay-ps"
> property.
>
> For older SoCs the only known supported values were 0ns and 2ns. The new
> SoCs have 200ps precision and support RGMII RX delays between 0ps and
> 3000ps.
>
> Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> .../bindings/net/amlogic,meson-dwmac.yaml | 52 ++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/amlogic,meson-dwmac.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/amlogic,meson-dwmac.yaml
> index 6b057b117aa0..bafde1194193 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/amlogic,meson-dwmac.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/amlogic,meson-dwmac.yaml
> @@ -74,18 +74,68 @@ allOf:
> Any configuration is ignored when the phy-mode is set to "rmii".
>
> amlogic,rx-delay-ns:
> + deprecated: true
> enum:
> - 0
> - 2
> default: 0
> + description:
> + The internal RGMII RX clock delay in nanoseconds. Deprecated, use
> + amlogic,rgmii-rx-delay-ps instead.
> +
> + amlogic,rgmii-rx-delay-ps:
> + default: 0
> description:
> The internal RGMII RX clock delay (provided by this IP block) in
> - nanoseconds. When phy-mode is set to "rgmii" then the RX delay
> + picoseconds. When phy-mode is set to "rgmii" then the RX delay
> should be explicitly configured. When the phy-mode is set to
> either "rgmii-id" or "rgmii-rxid" the RX clock delay is already
> provided by the PHY. Any configuration is ignored when the
> phy-mode is set to "rmii".

Hi Martin

I don't think the wording matches what the driver is actually doing:

if (dwmac->rx_delay_ns == 2)
rx_dly_config = PRG_ETH0_ADJ_ENABLE | PRG_ETH0_ADJ_SETUP;
else
rx_dly_config = 0;

switch (dwmac->phy_mode) {
case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII:
delay_config = tx_dly_config | rx_dly_config;
break;
case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_RXID:
delay_config = tx_dly_config;
break;
case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_TXID:
delay_config = rx_dly_config;
break;
case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_ID:
case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RMII:
delay_config = 0;
break;

So rx_delay is used for both rgmii and rgmii-txid. The binding says
nothing about rgmii-txid.

And while i'm looking at the code, i wonder about this:

if (rx_dly_config & PRG_ETH0_ADJ_ENABLE) {
if (!dwmac->timing_adj_clk) {
dev_err(dwmac->dev,
"The timing-adjustment clock is mandatory for the RX delay re-timing\n");
return -EINVAL;
}

/* The timing adjustment logic is driven by a separate clock */
ret = meson8b_devm_clk_prepare_enable(dwmac,
dwmac->timing_adj_clk);
if (ret) {
dev_err(dwmac->dev,
"Failed to enable the timing-adjustment clock\n");
return ret;
}
}

It looks like it can be that rx_dly_config & PRG_ETH0_ADJ_ENABLE is
true, so the clock is enabled, but delay_config does not contain
rx_delay_config, so it is pointless turning it on.

Andrew