Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/2] bpf: Add bpf_lsm_set_bprm_opts helper

From: Daniel Borkmann
Date: Tue Nov 17 2020 - 17:41:48 EST


On 11/17/20 3:13 AM, KP Singh wrote:
From: KP Singh <kpsingh@xxxxxxxxxx>

The helper allows modification of certain bits on the linux_binprm
struct starting with the secureexec bit which can be updated using the
BPF_LSM_F_BPRM_SECUREEXEC flag.

secureexec can be set by the LSM for privilege gaining executions to set
the AT_SECURE auxv for glibc. When set, the dynamic linker disables the
use of certain environment variables (like LD_PRELOAD).

Signed-off-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
scripts/bpf_helpers_doc.py | 2 ++
tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 65 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
index 162999b12790..bfa79054d106 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
@@ -3787,6 +3787,18 @@ union bpf_attr {
* *ARG_PTR_TO_BTF_ID* of type *task_struct*.
* Return
* Pointer to the current task.
+ *
+ * long bpf_lsm_set_bprm_opts(struct linux_binprm *bprm, u64 flags)
+ *

small nit: should have no extra newline (same for the tools/ copy)

+ * Description
+ * Set or clear certain options on *bprm*:
+ *
+ * **BPF_LSM_F_BPRM_SECUREEXEC** Set the secureexec bit
+ * which sets the **AT_SECURE** auxv for glibc. The bit
+ * is cleared if the flag is not specified.
+ * Return
+ * **-EINVAL** if invalid *flags* are passed.
+ *
*/
#define __BPF_FUNC_MAPPER(FN) \
FN(unspec), \
@@ -3948,6 +3960,7 @@ union bpf_attr {
FN(task_storage_get), \
FN(task_storage_delete), \
FN(get_current_task_btf), \
+ FN(lsm_set_bprm_opts), \
/* */
/* integer value in 'imm' field of BPF_CALL instruction selects which helper
@@ -4119,6 +4132,11 @@ enum bpf_lwt_encap_mode {
BPF_LWT_ENCAP_IP,
};
+/* Flags for LSM helpers */
+enum {
+ BPF_LSM_F_BPRM_SECUREEXEC = (1ULL << 0),
+};
+
#define __bpf_md_ptr(type, name) \
union { \
type name; \
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c
index 553107f4706a..cd85482228a0 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
#include <linux/filter.h>
#include <linux/bpf.h>
#include <linux/btf.h>
+#include <linux/binfmts.h>
#include <linux/lsm_hooks.h>
#include <linux/bpf_lsm.h>
#include <linux/kallsyms.h>
@@ -51,6 +52,30 @@ int bpf_lsm_verify_prog(struct bpf_verifier_log *vlog,
return 0;
}
+/* Mask for all the currently supported BPRM option flags */
+#define BPF_LSM_F_BRPM_OPTS_MASK BPF_LSM_F_BPRM_SECUREEXEC
+
+BPF_CALL_2(bpf_lsm_set_bprm_opts, struct linux_binprm *, bprm, u64, flags)
+{
+

ditto

Would have fixed up these things on the fly while applying, but one small item
I wanted to bring up here given uapi which will then freeze: it would be cleaner
to call the helper just bpf_bprm_opts_set() or so given it's implied that we
attach to lsm here and we don't use _lsm in the naming for the others either.
Similarly, I'd drop the _LSM from the flag/mask.

+ if (flags & ~BPF_LSM_F_BRPM_OPTS_MASK)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ bprm->secureexec = (flags & BPF_LSM_F_BPRM_SECUREEXEC);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+BTF_ID_LIST_SINGLE(bpf_lsm_set_bprm_opts_btf_ids, struct, linux_binprm)
+
+const static struct bpf_func_proto bpf_lsm_set_bprm_opts_proto = {
+ .func = bpf_lsm_set_bprm_opts,
+ .gpl_only = false,
+ .ret_type = RET_INTEGER,
+ .arg1_type = ARG_PTR_TO_BTF_ID,
+ .arg1_btf_id = &bpf_lsm_set_bprm_opts_btf_ids[0],
+ .arg2_type = ARG_ANYTHING,
+};
+
static const struct bpf_func_proto *
bpf_lsm_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id, const struct bpf_prog *prog)
{
@@ -71,6 +96,8 @@ bpf_lsm_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id, const struct bpf_prog *prog)
return &bpf_task_storage_get_proto;
case BPF_FUNC_task_storage_delete:
return &bpf_task_storage_delete_proto;
+ case BPF_FUNC_lsm_set_bprm_opts:
+ return &bpf_lsm_set_bprm_opts_proto;
default:
return tracing_prog_func_proto(func_id, prog);
}