Re: [net-next v3 0/8] seg6: add support for SRv6 End.DT4/DT6 behavior

[David Ahern]

On 11/24/20 4:49 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> 
> LGTM! Please address the nit and repost without the iproute2 patch.
> Mixing the iproute2 patch in has confused patchwork:
> 
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=389667&state=*
> 
> Note how it thinks that the iproute2 patch is part of the kernel
> series. This build bot-y thing is pretty new. I'll add a suggestion 
> to our process documentation not to mix patches.

That was me - I suggested doing that. I have done that in the past as
has several other people. I don't recall DaveM having a problem, so
maybe it is the new patchworks that is not liking it?

> 
>> I would like to thank David Ahern for his support during the development of
>> this patchset.
> 
> Should I take this to mean that David has review the code off-list?
> 

reviews and general guidance.