Re: [PATCH v2 02/17] vdpa_sim: remove unnecessary headers inclusion

From: Stefano Garzarella
Date: Mon Nov 30 2020 - 06:11:51 EST


On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 11:04:49AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:

On 2020/11/26 下午10:49, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
Some headers are not necessary, so let's remove them to do
some cleaning.

Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.c | 13 -------------
1 file changed, 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.c b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.c
index 6a90fdb9cbfc..c6eaf62df8ec 100644
--- a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.c
+++ b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.c
@@ -7,24 +7,11 @@
*
*/
-#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
-#include <linux/device.h>


I think the rule is to make sure e.g the structure definition can be via direct inclusion. E.g struct device {} is defined in this file.


-#include <linux/kernel.h>
-#include <linux/fs.h>
-#include <linux/poll.h>
-#include <linux/slab.h>
-#include <linux/sched.h>
-#include <linux/wait.h>
-#include <linux/uuid.h>
-#include <linux/iommu.h>
#include <linux/dma-map-ops.h>
-#include <linux/sysfs.h>
-#include <linux/file.h>
#include <linux/etherdevice.h>
#include <linux/vringh.h>
#include <linux/vdpa.h>
-#include <linux/virtio_byteorder.h>


And the  __cpu_to_virtio16 is defined in this file.


Okay, I'll keep this two includes and check better the others.

Thanks,
Stefano