Re: [Ksummit-discuss] crediting bug reports and fixes folded into original patch

From: Joe Perches
Date: Thu Dec 03 2020 - 14:25:27 EST


On Thu, 2020-12-03 at 14:17 -0500, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 08:55:54AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> > Perhaps automate a mechanism to capture that information as
> > git notes for the patches when applied.
>
> Git notes have a limited usefulness for this -- they are indeed part of
> the repository, but they aren't replicated unless someone does a
> --mirror clone (or specifically fetches refs/notes/*). If the goal is to
> improve visibility for contributors, then putting this info into a git
> note will hardly make more difference than providing a Link: that
> someone has to follow to a list archival service.

Or it becomes standard to fetch the refs/notes/... at the pull time.

> I can offer the following proposal:
>
> - kernel.org already monitors all mailing lists that are archived on
>   lore.kernel.org for the purposes of pull request tracking
>   (pr-tracker-bot).
> - in the near future, we will add a separate process that will
>   auto-explode all pull requests into individual patches and add them
>   to a separate public-inbox archive (think of it as another
>   transparency log, since pull requests are transient and opaque).
>
> We can additionally:
>
> - identify all Link: and Message-Id: entries in commit messages,
>   retrieve the threads they refer to, and archive them as part of the
>   same (or adjacent) transparency log.
>
> This offers an improvement over the status quo, because if
> lore.kernel.org becomes unavailable, someone would have to have access
> to all backend archive repositories it is currently tracking in order to
> be able to reconstitute relevant conversations -- whereas with this
> change, it should be sufficient to just have the copy of the
> transparency log to have a fully self-contained high-relevancy archive
> of both individual commits and conversations that happened around them.

I think that would be great. Thanks.

I think all the requests for additional -by: -from: signature/bylines
becoe unnecessary if and when this proposal is implemented.