Re: [PATCH v13 07/15] iommu/smmuv3: Allow stage 1 invalidation with unmanaged ASIDs

[Auger Eric]

Hi Shameer, Jean-Philippe,

On 12/4/20 11:20 AM, Shameerali Kolothum Thodi wrote:
> Hi Jean,
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jean-Philippe Brucker [mailto:jean-philippe@xxxxxxxxxx]
>> Sent: 04 December 2020 09:54
>> To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Auger Eric <eric.auger@xxxxxxxxxx>; wangxingang
>> <wangxingang5@xxxxxxxxxx>; Xieyingtai <xieyingtai@xxxxxxxxxx>;
>> kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; maz@xxxxxxxxxx; joro@xxxxxxxxxx; will@xxxxxxxxxx;
>> iommu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
>> vivek.gautam@xxxxxxx; alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx;
>> zhangfei.gao@xxxxxxxxxx; robin.murphy@xxxxxxx;
>> kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; eric.auger.pro@xxxxxxxxx; Zengtao (B)
>> <prime.zeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; qubingbing <qubingbing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 07/15] iommu/smmuv3: Allow stage 1 invalidation with
>> unmanaged ASIDs
>>
>> Hi Shameer,
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 06:42:57PM +0000, Shameerali Kolothum Thodi wrote:
>>> Hi Jean/zhangfei,
>>> Is it possible to have a branch with minimum required SVA/UACCE related
>> patches
>>> that are already public and can be a "stable" candidate for future respin of
>> Eric's series?
>>> Please share your thoughts.
>>
>> By "stable" you mean a fixed branch with the latest SVA/UACCE patches
>> based on mainline? 
> 
> Yes. 
> 
>  The uacce-devel branches from
>> https://github.com/Linaro/linux-kernel-uadk do provide this at the moment
>> (they track the latest sva/zip-devel branch
>> https://jpbrucker.net/git/linux/ which is roughly based on mainline.)
> 
> Thanks. 
> 
> Hi Eric,
> 
> Could you please take a look at the above branches and see whether it make sense
> to rebase on top of either of those?
> 
> From vSVA point of view, it will be less rebase hassle if we can do that.

Sure. I will rebase on top of this ;-)

Thanks

Eric
> 
> Thanks,
> Shameer
> 
>> Thanks,
>> Jean
>