[RFC PATCH v2 6/6] MFD: bd71828: differentiate bd71828 and bd71827 chargers

From: Matti Vaittinen
Date: Fri Dec 04 2020 - 07:54:55 EST


BD71828 and BD71827 charger blocks have some minor differencies.
Use own name for BD71828 so that charger driver can differentiate
these by device-id.

Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

This patch is also provided in this RFC version only for the sake
of the completeness.

drivers/mfd/rohm-bd71828.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mfd/rohm-bd71828.c b/drivers/mfd/rohm-bd71828.c
index 210261d026f2..fbd6e30136d9 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/rohm-bd71828.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/rohm-bd71828.c
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ static struct mfd_cell bd71828_mfd_cells[] = {
* BD70528 clock gate are the register address and mask.
*/
{ .name = "bd71828-clk", },
- { .name = "bd71827-power", },
+ { .name = "bd71828-power", },
{
.name = "bd71828-rtc",
.resources = rtc_irqs,
--
2.25.4


--
Matti Vaittinen, Linux device drivers
ROHM Semiconductors, Finland SWDC
Kiviharjunlenkki 1E
90220 OULU
FINLAND

~~~ "I don't think so," said Rene Descartes. Just then he vanished ~~~
Simon says - in Latin please.
~~~ "non cogito me" dixit Rene Descarte, deinde evanescavit ~~~
Thanks to Simon Glass for the translation =]