Re: [PATCH v8 00/16] Add support for Clang LTO

[Nathan Chancellor]

On Sun, Dec 06, 2020 at 12:09:31PM -0800, Sami Tolvanen wrote:
> Sure, looks good to me. However, I think we should also test for
> LLVM=1 to avoid possible further issues with mismatched toolchains
> instead of only checking for llvm-nm and llvm-ar.

It might still be worth testing for $(AR) and $(NM) because in theory, a
user could say 'make AR=ar LLVM=1'. Highly unlikely I suppose but worth
considering.

Cheers,
Nathan