[BUG] jevents problem when cross building Re: [PATCH 2/3] perf tools: Allow to enable/disable events via control file

From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Date: Thu Dec 10 2020 - 12:27:44 EST

Next message: Tom Lendacky: "[PATCH v5 33/34] KVM: SVM: Provide an updated VMRUN invocation for SEV-ES guests"
Previous message: Florian Fainelli: "Re: [PATCH -next] thermal: broadcom: simplify the return expression of bcm2711_thermal_probe()"
In reply to: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo: "Re: [PATCH 2/3] perf tools: Allow to enable/disable events via control file"
Next in thread: John Garry: "Re: [BUG] jevents problem when cross building Re: [PATCH 2/3] perf tools: Allow to enable/disable events via control file"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Em Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 02:19:03PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 02:15:03PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> > Em Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 05:24:30PM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > > On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 08:02:20PM +0300, Alexei Budankov wrote:
> > > > On 06.12.2020 20:05, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > > > > @@ -1952,6 +1958,8 @@ int evlist__ctlfd_process(struct evlist *evlist, enum evlist_ctl_cmd *cmd)
> > > > > char cmd_data[EVLIST_CTL_CMD_MAX_LEN];
> > > > > int ctlfd_pos = evlist->ctl_fd.pos;
> > > > > struct pollfd *entries = evlist->core.pollfd.entries;
> > > > > + struct evsel *evsel;
> > > > > + char *evsel_name;

> > > > > if (!evlist__ctlfd_initialized(evlist) || !entries[ctlfd_pos].revents)
> > > > > return 0;
> > > > > @@ -1967,6 +1975,26 @@ int evlist__ctlfd_process(struct evlist *evlist, enum evlist_ctl_cmd *cmd)
> > > > > case EVLIST_CTL_CMD_DISABLE:
> > > > > evlist__disable(evlist);
> > > > > break;
> > > > > + case EVLIST_CTL_CMD_ENABLE_EVSEL:
> > > > > + evsel_name = cmd_data + sizeof(EVLIST_CTL_CMD_ENABLE_EVSEL_TAG) - 1;
>
> > > > It makes sense to check that evsel_name still points
> > > > into cmd_data buffer after assigning to event name.

> > > right, will add that

> > So, I'm finishing test builds, so probably I'll push the first two
> > patches publicly and then you can send a patch on top of this, ok?

> > Unless the tests break somewhere and then I'll have to restart, so I'll
> > fold in whatever gets at that time...

> That was quick:

> [perfbuilder@five ~]$ time dm
> Thu Dec 10 01:44:52 PM -03 2020
> # export PERF_TARBALL=http://192.168.86.5/perf/perf-5.10.0-rc6.tar.xz
> # dm
> 1 78.47 alpine:3.4 : Ok gcc (Alpine 5.3.0) 5.3.0, clang version 3.8.0 (tags/RELEASE_380/final)
> 2 104.38 alpine:3.5 : Ok gcc (Alpine 6.2.1) 6.2.1 20160822, clang version 3.8.1 (tags/RELEASE_381/final)
> 3 105.64 alpine:3.6 : Ok gcc (Alpine 6.3.0) 6.3.0, clang version 4.0.0 (tags/RELEASE_400/final)
> 4 96.52 alpine:3.7 : Ok gcc (Alpine 6.4.0) 6.4.0, Alpine clang version 5.0.0 (tags/RELEASE_500/final) (based on LLVM 5.0.0)
> 5 81.08 alpine:3.8 : Ok gcc (Alpine 6.4.0) 6.4.0, Alpine clang version 5.0.1 (tags/RELEASE_501/final) (based on LLVM 5.0.1)
> 6 85.20 alpine:3.9 : Ok gcc (Alpine 8.3.0) 8.3.0, Alpine clang version 5.0.1 (tags/RELEASE_502/final) (based on LLVM 5.0.1)
> 7 106.10 alpine:3.10 : Ok gcc (Alpine 8.3.0) 8.3.0, Alpine clang version 8.0.0 (tags/RELEASE_800/final) (based on LLVM 8.0.0)
> 8 120.20 alpine:3.11 : Ok gcc (Alpine 9.3.0) 9.3.0, Alpine clang version 9.0.0 (https://git.alpinelinux.org/aports f7f0d2c2b8bcd6a5843401a9a702029556492689) (based on LLVM 9.0.0)
> 9 109.99 alpine:3.12 : Ok gcc (Alpine 9.3.0) 9.3.0, Alpine clang version 10.0.0 (https://gitlab.alpinelinux.org/alpine/aports.git 7445adce501f8473efdb93b17b5eaf2f1445ed4c)
> 10 117.76 alpine:edge : Ok gcc (Alpine 10.2.0) 10.2.0, Alpine clang version 10.0.1
> 11 69.15 alt:p8 : Ok x86_64-alt-linux-gcc (GCC) 5.3.1 20151207 (ALT p8 5.3.1-alt3.M80P.1), clang version 3.8.0 (tags/RELEASE_380/final)
> 12 84.55 alt:p9 : Ok x86_64-alt-linux-gcc (GCC) 8.4.1 20200305 (ALT p9 8.4.1-alt0.p9.1), clang version 10.0.0
> 13 82.69 alt:sisyphus : Ok x86_64-alt-linux-gcc (GCC) 9.3.1 20200518 (ALT Sisyphus 9.3.1-alt1), clang version 10.0.1
> 14 66.22 amazonlinux:1 : Ok gcc (GCC) 7.2.1 20170915 (Red Hat 7.2.1-2), clang version 3.6.2 (tags/RELEASE_362/final)
> 15 100.16 amazonlinux:2 : Ok gcc (GCC) 7.3.1 20180712 (Red Hat 7.3.1-9), clang version 7.0.1 (Amazon Linux 2 7.0.1-1.amzn2.0.2)
> 16 11.20 android-ndk:r12b-arm : FAIL arm-linux-androideabi-gcc (GCC) 4.9.x 20150123 (prerelease)
> 17 11.90 android-ndk:r15c-arm : FAIL arm-linux-androideabi-gcc (GCC) 4.9.x 20150123 (prerelease)
> 18 26.33 centos:6 : Ok gcc (GCC) 4.4.7 20120313 (Red Hat 4.4.7-23)
> 19 31.80 centos:7 : Ok gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44)
> 20 116.02 centos:8 : Ok gcc (GCC) 8.3.1 20191121 (Red Hat 8.3.1-5), clang version 9.0.1 (Red Hat 9.0.1-2.module_el8.2.0+309+0c7b6b03)
> 21 62.27 clearlinux:latest : Ok gcc (Clear Linux OS for Intel Architecture) 10.2.1 20201106 releases/gcc-10.2.0-475-g099857318c, clang version 10.0.1
> 22 77.82 debian:8 : Ok gcc (Debian 4.9.2-10+deb8u2) 4.9.2, Debian clang version 3.5.0-10 (tags/RELEASE_350/final) (based on LLVM 3.5.0)
> 23: debian:9
>
>
> There I go...
>
> [perfbuilder@five ~]$ tail -20 dm.log/android-ndk\:r12b-arm
> FLEX /tmp/build/perf/util/expr-flex.c
> CC /tmp/build/perf/util/pmu-bison.o
> CC /tmp/build/perf/util/expr-bison.o
> CC /tmp/build/perf/util/expr-flex.o
> CC /tmp/build/perf/util/expr.o
> CC /tmp/build/perf/util/parse-events.o
> CC /tmp/build/perf/util/parse-events-flex.o
> CC /tmp/build/perf/util/pmu.o
> CC /tmp/build/perf/util/pmu-flex.o
> LD /tmp/build/perf/util/intel-pt-decoder/perf-in.o
> LD /tmp/build/perf/util/perf-in.o
> LD /tmp/build/perf/perf-in.o
> LINK /tmp/build/perf/perf
> /tmp/build/perf/perf-in.o:hist.c:function pmu_for_each_sys_event: error: undefined reference to 'pmu_sys_event_tables'
> collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
> make[2]: *** [Makefile.perf:659: /tmp/build/perf/perf] Error 1
> make[1]: *** [Makefile.perf:233: sub-make] Error 2
> make: *** [Makefile:70: all] Error 2
> make: Leaving directory '/git/linux/tools/perf'
> + exit 1
> [perfbuilder@five ~]
>
> Now to figure out who generates this pmu_sys_event_tables, John?

One more:

[perfbuilder@five ~]$ tail -20 dm.log/debian\:experimental-x-mips64
CC /tmp/build/perf/util/expr-bison.o
CC /tmp/build/perf/util/parse-events.o
CC /tmp/build/perf/util/pmu.o
CC /tmp/build/perf/util/parse-events-flex.o
CC /tmp/build/perf/util/pmu-flex.o
CC /tmp/build/perf/util/expr-flex.o
CC /tmp/build/perf/util/expr.o
LD /tmp/build/perf/util/intel-pt-decoder/perf-in.o
LD /tmp/build/perf/util/perf-in.o
LD /tmp/build/perf/perf-in.o
LINK /tmp/build/perf/perf
/usr/lib/gcc-cross/mips64-linux-gnuabi64/9/../../../../mips64-linux-gnuabi64/bin/ld: /tmp/build/perf/perf-in.o: in function `pmu_for_each_sys_event':
/git/linux/tools/perf/util/pmu.c:825: undefined reference to `pmu_sys_event_tables'
/usr/lib/gcc-cross/mips64-linux-gnuabi64/9/../../../../mips64-linux-gnuabi64/bin/ld: /git/linux/tools/perf/util/pmu.c:825: undefined reference to `pmu_sys_event_tables'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
make[2]: *** [Makefile.perf:659: /tmp/build/perf/perf] Error 1
make[1]: *** [Makefile.perf:233: sub-make] Error 2
make: *** [Makefile:70: all] Error 2
make: Leaving directory '/git/linux/tools/perf'
+ exit 1
[perfbuilder@five ~]$

And another:

[perfbuilder@five ~]$ tail -20 dm.log/fedora:24-x-ARC-uClibc
CC /tmp/build/perf/util/expr.o
LD /tmp/build/perf/util/intel-pt-decoder/perf-in.o
LD /tmp/build/perf/util/perf-in.o
LD /tmp/build/perf/perf-in.o
LINK /tmp/build/perf/perf
/tmp/build/perf/perf-in.o: In function `pmu_for_each_sys_event':
/git/linux/tools/perf/util/pmu.c:816: undefined reference to `pmu_sys_event_tables'
/git/linux/tools/perf/util/pmu.c:816: undefined reference to `pmu_sys_event_tables'
/tmp/build/perf/perf-in.o: In function `pmu_add_sys_aliases':
/git/linux/tools/perf/util/pmu.c:886: undefined reference to `pmu_sys_event_tables'
/git/linux/tools/perf/util/pmu.c:886: undefined reference to `pmu_sys_event_tables'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
Makefile.perf:659: recipe for target '/tmp/build/perf/perf' failed
make[2]: *** [/tmp/build/perf/perf] Error 1
Makefile.perf:232: recipe for target 'sub-make' failed
make[1]: *** [sub-make] Error 2
Makefile:69: recipe for target 'all' failed
make: *** [all] Error 2
make: Leaving directory '/git/linux/tools/perf'
+ exit 1
[perfbuilder@five ~]$

So far all the cross builds failed.

- Arnaldo

Next message: Tom Lendacky: "[PATCH v5 33/34] KVM: SVM: Provide an updated VMRUN invocation for SEV-ES guests"
Previous message: Florian Fainelli: "Re: [PATCH -next] thermal: broadcom: simplify the return expression of bcm2711_thermal_probe()"
In reply to: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo: "Re: [PATCH 2/3] perf tools: Allow to enable/disable events via control file"
Next in thread: John Garry: "Re: [BUG] jevents problem when cross building Re: [PATCH 2/3] perf tools: Allow to enable/disable events via control file"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]