Re: [PATCH 06/18] arm64: dts: renesas: beacon: Configure Audio CODEC clocks

From: Adam Ford
Date: Fri Dec 18 2020 - 09:24:47 EST


On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 6:57 AM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Adam,
>
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 2:33 PM Adam Ford <aford173@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 5:12 AM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > CC alsa-devel
> > >
> > > On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 7:38 PM Adam Ford <aford173@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > With the newly added configurable clock options, the audio CODEC can
> > > > configure the mclk automatically. Add the reference to the versaclock.
> > > > Since the devices on I2C5 can communicate at 400KHz, let's also increase
> > > > that too
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Adam Ford <aford173@xxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > Thanks for your patch!
> > >
> > > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/beacon-renesom-baseboard.dtsi
> > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/beacon-renesom-baseboard.dtsi
> > > > @@ -424,13 +424,15 @@ &i2c0 {
> > > >
> > > > &i2c5 {
> > > > status = "okay";
> > > > - clock-frequency = <100000>;
> > > > + clock-frequency = <400000>;
> > > > pinctrl-0 = <&i2c5_pins>;
> > > > pinctrl-names = "default";
> > > >
> > > > codec: wm8962@1a {
> > > > compatible = "wlf,wm8962";
> > > > reg = <0x1a>;
> > > > + clocks = <&versaclock6_bb 3>;
> > > > + clock-names = "mclk";
> > >
> > > While the driver does get the (nameless) clock, the DT bindings lack any
> > > mention of a clocks property. It would be good to update the bindings.
> >
> > Agreed. I'll push an update to add the clocks property.
>
> Thanks!
>
> > > Note that arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6-logicpd-baseboard.dtsi and
> > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-beacon-baseboard.dtsi (both by your
> > > hand) use "xclk" instead of "mclk"?
> >
> > On the schematics for the two imx boards, it's labeled as xclk, so it
> > was named as such. For this board, the schematic names it mclk. The
> > driver doesn't care about the clock-names property, so I'll just
> > remove them.
>
> If there's a single clock, not using clock-names is fine.
> If you do use clock-names, the names should be clock-centric, not
> board-centric.

I already submitted patches to remove the clock-names reference from
the other two boards you noted [1]. I agree it should match the
driver and not the schematic. That line was a left-over from our
internal git repo where the decision was used to follow the schematic
and not the driver.

Thanks for bringing that to my attention.

adam

[1] - https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-kernel/list/?series=403739

>
> BTW, looking at the WM8962 datasheet, it's called "MCLK".
>
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
> Geert
>
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
> -- Linus Torvalds