Re: [PATCH v6 3/4] perf-stat: enable counting events for BPF programs

From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Date: Tue Dec 29 2020 - 13:49:12 EST


Em Tue, Dec 29, 2020 at 06:42:18PM +0000, Song Liu escreveu:
>
>
> > On Dec 29, 2020, at 7:15 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Em Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 11:43:25PM +0000, Song Liu escreveu:
> >>
> >>
> >>> On Dec 28, 2020, at 12:11 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Em Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 09:40:53AM -0800, Song Liu escreveu:
> >>>> Introduce perf-stat -b option, which counts events for BPF programs, like:
> >>>>
> >>>> [root@localhost ~]# ~/perf stat -e ref-cycles,cycles -b 254 -I 1000
> >>>> 1.487903822 115,200 ref-cycles
> >>>> 1.487903822 86,012 cycles
> >>>> 2.489147029 80,560 ref-cycles
> >>>> 2.489147029 73,784 cycles
> >>>> 3.490341825 60,720 ref-cycles
> >>>> 3.490341825 37,797 cycles
> >>>> 4.491540887 37,120 ref-cycles
> >>>> 4.491540887 31,963 cycles
> >>>>
> >>>> The example above counts cycles and ref-cycles of BPF program of id 254.
> >>>> This is similar to bpftool-prog-profile command, but more flexible.
> >>>>
> >>>> perf-stat -b creates per-cpu perf_event and loads fentry/fexit BPF
> >>>> programs (monitor-progs) to the target BPF program (target-prog). The
> >>>> monitor-progs read perf_event before and after the target-prog, and
> >>>> aggregate the difference in a BPF map. Then the user space reads data
> >>>> from these maps.
> >>>>
> >>>> A new struct bpf_counter is introduced to provide common interface that
> >>>> uses BPF programs/maps to count perf events.
> >>>
> >>> Segfaulting here:
> >>>
> >>> [root@five ~]# bpftool prog | grep tracepoint
> >>> 110: tracepoint name syscall_unaugme tag 57cd311f2e27366b gpl
> >>> 111: tracepoint name sys_enter_conne tag 3555418ac9476139 gpl
> >>> 112: tracepoint name sys_enter_sendt tag bc7fcadbaf7b8145 gpl
> >>> 113: tracepoint name sys_enter_open tag 0e59c3ac2bea5280 gpl
> >>> 114: tracepoint name sys_enter_opena tag 0baf443610f59837 gpl
> >>> 115: tracepoint name sys_enter_renam tag 24664e4aca62d7fa gpl
> >>> 116: tracepoint name sys_enter_renam tag 20093e51a8634ebb gpl
> >>> 117: tracepoint name sys_enter tag 0bc3fc9d11754ba1 gpl
> >>> 118: tracepoint name sys_exit tag 29c7ae234d79bd5c gpl
> >>> [root@five ~]#
> >>> [root@five ~]# gdb perf
> >>> GNU gdb (GDB) Fedora 10.1-2.fc33
> >>> Reading symbols from perf...
> >>> (gdb) run stat -e instructions,cycles -b 113 -I 1000
> >>> Starting program: /root/bin/perf stat -e instructions,cycles -b 113 -I 1000
> >>> [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
> >>> Using host libthread_db library "/lib64/libthread_db.so.1".
> >>> libbpf: elf: skipping unrecognized data section(9) .eh_frame
> >>> libbpf: elf: skipping relo section(15) .rel.eh_frame for section(9) .eh_frame
> >>> libbpf: elf: skipping unrecognized data section(9) .eh_frame
> >>> libbpf: elf: skipping relo section(15) .rel.eh_frame for section(9) .eh_frame
> >>>
> >>> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> >>> 0x000000000058d55b in bpf_program_profiler__read (evsel=0xc612c0) at util/bpf_counter.c:217
> >>> 217 reading_map_fd = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.accum_readings);
> >>> (gdb) bt
> >>> #0 0x000000000058d55b in bpf_program_profiler__read (evsel=0xc612c0) at util/bpf_counter.c:217
> >>> #1 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
> >>> (gdb)
> >>>
> >>> [acme@five perf]$ clang -v |& head -2
> >>> clang version 11.0.0 (Fedora 11.0.0-2.fc33)
> >>> Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
> >>> [acme@five perf]$
> >>>
> >>> Do you need any extra info?
> >>
> >> Hmm... I am not able to reproduce this. I am trying to setup an environment similar
> >> to fc33 (clang 11, etc.). Does this segfault every time, and on all programs?
> >
> > I'll try it with a BPF proggie attached to a kprobes, but here is
> > something else I noticed:
> >
> > [root@five perf]# export PYTHONPATH=/tmp/build/perf/python
> > [root@five perf]# tools/perf/python/twatch.py
> > Traceback (most recent call last):
> > File "/home/acme/git/perf/tools/perf/python/twatch.py", line 9, in <module>
> > import perf
> > ImportError: /tmp/build/perf/python/perf.cpython-39-x86_64-linux-gnu.so: undefined symbol: bpf_counter__destroy
> > [root@five perf]# perf test python
> > 19: 'import perf' in python : FAILED!
> > [root@five perf]# perf test -v python
> > 19: 'import perf' in python :
> > --- start ---
> > test child forked, pid 3198864
> > python usage test: "echo "import sys ; sys.path.append('/tmp/build/perf/python'); import perf" | '/usr/bin/python3' "
> > Traceback (most recent call last):
> > File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
> > ImportError: /tmp/build/perf/python/perf.cpython-39-x86_64-linux-gnu.so: undefined symbol: bpf_counter__destroy
> > test child finished with -1
> > ---- end ----
> > 'import perf' in python: FAILED!
> > [root@five perf]#
> >
> > This should be trivial, I hope, just add the new object file to
> > tools/perf/util/python-ext-sources, then do a 'perf test python', if it
> > fails, use 'perf test -v python' to see what is preventing the python
> > binding from loading.
>
> I fixed the undefined bpf_counter__destroy. But this one looks trickier:
>
> 19: 'import perf' in python :
> --- start ---
> test child forked, pid 2714986
> python usage test: "echo "import sys ; sys.path.append('python'); import perf" | '/bin/python2' "
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
> ImportError: XXXXX /tools/perf/python/perf.so: undefined symbol: bpf_map_update_elem
>
> Given I already have:

I'll check this one to get a patch that at least moves the needle here,
i.e. probably we can leave supporting bpf counters in the python binding
for a later step.

- Arnaldo

> diff --git i/tools/perf/util/python-ext-sources w/tools/perf/util/python-ext-sources
> index a9d9c142eb7c3..2cac55273eca2 100644
> --- i/tools/perf/util/python-ext-sources
> +++ w/tools/perf/util/python-ext-sources
> @@ -35,3 +35,6 @@ util/symbol_fprintf.c
> util/units.c
> util/affinity.c
> util/rwsem.c
> +util/bpf_counter.c
> +../lib/bpf/bpf.c
> +../lib/bpf/libbpf.c
>
>
> How should I fix this?
>
> Thanks,
> Song
>
> PS: I still cannot reproduce that segfault...
>
> >
>

--

- Arnaldo