Re: [net-next PATCH v12 4/4] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Add support for mv88e6393x family of Marvell

From: Marek Behún
Date: Tue Jan 05 2021 - 07:16:10 EST


On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 22:51:01 +1000
Pavana Sharma <pavana.sharma@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> +int mv88e6393x_serdes_irq_enable(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, int port,
> + int lane, bool enable)
> +{
> + u8 cmode = chip->ports[port].cmode;
> + int err = 0;
> +
> + switch (cmode) {
> + case MV88E6XXX_PORT_STS_CMODE_SGMII:
> + case MV88E6XXX_PORT_STS_CMODE_1000BASEX:
> + case MV88E6XXX_PORT_STS_CMODE_2500BASEX:
> + case MV88E6XXX_PORT_STS_CMODE_5GBASER:
> + case MV88E6XXX_PORT_STS_CMODE_10GBASER:
> + err = mv88e6390_serdes_irq_enable_sgmii(chip, lane, enable);
> + }

This is wrong. IRQ for 5gbase-r and 10gbase-r is enabled differently.
Please look at how I did it in my proposal
https://www.mail-archive.com/netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg347854.html
Please look at the following functions in that patch:

mv88e6393x_serdes_irq_enable_10g()
mv88e6393x_serdes_irq_enable()
mv88e6393x_serdes_irq_status_10g()
irqreturn_t mv88e6393x_serdes_irq_status()

and also at the constants added to serdes.h in that patch

#define MV88E6393X_10G_INT_ENABLE 0x9000
#define MV88E6393X_10G_INT_LINK_CHANGE BIT(2)
#define MV88E6393X_10G_INT_STATUS 0x9001